The Witch Doctor

“Hard to believe that in 2025 we have to be telling people that vaccines are safe and slavery was bad.”
– Facebook post

There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”

-Isaac Asimov

In her later years when she was much more an intellectual influencer than a fiction author, Ayn Rand developed theories of politics and a certain vocabulary to refer to common concepts. And one of her terms was “Attila and the Witch Doctor.” This referred to the idea that every tyrant needs something to back him up in the realm of debate. “Attila” refers to the outright thug who sees government solely in terms of brute force. Examples would be the famous dictators of the 1940s and Third World strongmen. “The Witch Doctor” is his necessary complement, the intellectual influencer who promotes and enables the anti-reason collectivism of the Attila with nonsense philosophy and sophistry that usually comes down to “reality isn’t real”, “you can’t prove anything” or “the people who claim objectivity exists are just lying.” Examples would be various breeds of post-modernists, or anybody who says that politics has less to do with abstract ideas than power relationships. This sort of thing used to be the province of the Left, but just as the old fascists stole all their best lines from the communists, the alt-Right fully embraces “post-truth” as a means to power, by convincing people to doubt what was previously assumed, whether it was proven or not. Which makes it that much easier to assume control: When you’re a dictator, the goal is not necessarily to make people only believe the State, it’s to make them not believe anything, so that they can’t trust anything and therefore your nonsense is just as valid as the other guy’s verified facts.

We already know that Donald Trump is America’s Attila – the bone-in-the-nose, ooga-booga tribal war chieftain who stomps on everything in his path and calls that governance. But who in this terminology is the Witch Doctor of the Trump Party? It’s pretty obvious, especially after this month: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Kennedy was of course a famous member of a Democratic Party political dynasty and remained a Democrat until fairly recently when he became more at odds with the Party over his “unorthodox” beliefs about the health system. He does in fact have a lifelong history of alternative self-medication, dating back at least to college, where he credited his heroin addiction with improving his attention span in class. Despite disdain for vaccines and other mainstream medical services, Kennedy has continued to be plagued by health issues, including a memory loss that he attributed to “a worm that got into my brain and ate a portion of it and then died”. His voice has been permanently damaged by spasmodic dysphonia, causing it to be rough and difficult to understand. The reasons for his conditions and the extent of them are unknown because he has not released his medical records.

His wife is the actress Cheryl Hines, recently most famous for appearing in HBO’s Curb Your Enthusiasm, in which she played the normie bystander wife of a gravel-voiced crank who antagonizes everyone around him.

During COVID, Kennedy attracted controversy by saying that not only did the virus originate in China, it was developed to depopulate nations while specifically avoiding “Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.”
Well, seriously, if you were China and you were trying to screw with the United States, why would you target the people who go to Chinese restaurants?

Even so, RFK Junior had developed a respectable civilian career as an environmental advocate and lawyer for disadvantaged communities. So being against “the establishment” in various senses put him in the same category as Tulsi Gabbard and some other nominal Democrats who no longer aligned with that party but were not really conservative enough for Republicans. Accordingly, with his vaccine-skeptic agenda, RFK made an independent run for president in 2024, which given how close the polls were made him a real threat to Donald Trump, given that he attracted the kind of people who were, again, not conservative but less likely to vote for Kamala Harris than Trump. This came to a head when both RFK and Trump were invited to the Libertarian Party 2024 convention to appeal for their endorsement and Kennedy was well-received and Trump was… not. So after that Trump put the moves on Kennedy (and Gabbard) to appeal for their endorsement, which he got. This despite the fact that Kennedy was a former liberal and had been quoted as saying Trump was a “terrible human being”, a “discredit to democracy”, and “probably a sociopath“. And perhaps not coincidentally, once Trump got elected with the support of independents and former Democrats, he gave Kennedy a Cabinet position running the Department of Health and Human Services, where he would be able to run the bureaucracy in the exact opposite direction from where it had been. And even before that, once Kennedy endorsed Trump, he identified his health-skeptic movement with broader Trumpism, calling it “Make America Healthy Again.”

“Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) is the only MAGA sub-movement with its own famous name, which is odd given that it is only one of several important follower movements such as MARA (Make America Racist Again), MACA (Make America Chauvinist Again) and MASA (Make America Stupid Again). But like MAGA (Make America Great Again), MAHA works through the Orwellian tactic of using a positive label in order to promote its exact opposite.

As HHS Secretary, Kennedy creates policy based on the broader “MAHA” agenda, which attacks the use of vaccines as a cause of autism in children (with little evidence) and otherwise attacks the use of pharmaceuticals and processed foods in the American lifestyle. His idea of running the health care bureaucracy seems to center on slashing its staff. And merely in his public actions, Kennedy demonstrates a cavalier disregard for what ought to be the responsibilities of his job.

For example, in response to the mass shooting at a Catholic school, RFK not only blamed the use of anti-depressants by juveniles, he said, “When I was a kid, we had shooting clubs at our school. People, kids, my classmates, other people would bring a .22 rifle with their guns to school and park it in the parking lot.”

So apparently we’re supposed to believe that the son of Bobby Kennedy and the nephew of Jack Kennedy is okay with kids taking guns to school.

Next he’s probably going to advocate for the health benefits of drunk driving.

Which only points up the fact that however sordid the Kennedy clan in were in their private lives, at least they didn’t bring their vices into politics.

Kennedy’s basis of policy is pretty well summed up by an interview he did with Tucker Carlson, where he said,, “My opinion, I always tell people, is irrelevant. We, you know, people, we need to stop trusting the experts. Right. We were told at the beginning of COVID don’t look at any data yourself, don’t do any investigation yourself. Just trust the experts. And trusting the experts is not a feature of science. It’s not a feature of democracy. It’s a feature of religion and it’s a feature of totalitarianism. In democracies, we have the obligation, and it’s one of the burdens of citizenship to do our own research and make our own determinations about things.”

(Which led to John Cleese’s line, ‘I wonder what the qualifications are for not being an expert’.)

This statement in itself goes a long way to explain how MAGA in general and MAHA in particular can appeal to an eclectic group of people who wouldn’t necessarily go along with the darker aspects of MAGA – like the racism, authoritarianism and religious hypocrisy – by appealing to their intellectual vices, and thus eventually getting them to embrace the racism, authoritarianism and religious hypocrisy.

A central issue with the Trump regime (because ‘administration’ is the Hegelian radical antithesis of what they’re doing) is that you can only rebel against The Man so long until you either keep failing or you succeed, and at that point you become The Man. That’s where Republicans (including MAHA) are now. And leading from that, once “conservatives” (now including MAHA) get power, they reveal the hypocrisy of their movement: rather than endorsing freedom against an overbearing government so they can live according to their choice, they want to commandeer that overbearing government to their purposes to make everyone else live according to their choice.

The same people who wail “this is a republic, not a democracy” fail to bring up the reason the Founders made the distinction, and why they put so many counter-majoritarian elements in the US Constitution: You want to have people who actually know what they’re doing running things, even if the general direction is set by the public. Otherwise the public good itself would be undermined: “It is a just observation, that the people commonly INTEND the PUBLIC GOOD. This often applies to their very errors. But their good sense would despise the adulator who should pretend that they always REASON RIGHT about the MEANS of promoting it. They know from experience that they sometimes err; and the wonder is that they so seldom err as they do, beset, as they continually are, by the wiles of parasites and sycophants, by the snares of the ambitious, the avaricious, the desperate, by the artifices of men who possess their confidence more than they deserve it, and of those who seek to possess rather than to deserve it. When occasions present themselves, in which the interests of the people are at variance with their inclinations, it is the duty of the persons whom they have appointed to be the guardians of those interests, to withstand the temporary delusion, in order to give them time and opportunity for more cool and sedate reflection. Instances might be cited in which a conduct of this kind has saved the people from very fatal consequences of their own mistakes, and has procured lasting monuments of their gratitude to the men who had courage and magnanimity enough to serve them at the peril of their displeasure.” (The Federalist, No. 71)

And this is why the Trump regime demonstrates that our old republic really is now a democracy because it demonstrates the indulgences that the Founders thought pure democracy would fall err to. Not just the takeover by a demagogue but the inconstancy of public policy based on unqualified but popular opinions.

MAHA, while represented by Mr. Kennedy, embraces a whole range of alternative health theories, some of which, like avoiding processed foods or eliminating artificial food dyes, are hardly bad in themselves. The movement also gained traction in the wake of COVID quarantines (which were enforced mainly by state governments, NOT the first Trump Administration, cause ‘freedom’), especially in regard to not allowing people to congregate in houses of worship. However some of these concerns are perennial quack theories. In particular, MAHA opposes the fluoridation of public water. Their designation of what constitutes ‘healthy’ vs. ‘unhealthy’, rather than examining the data, is based largely in culture war prejudices. For instance, it has been noted by people across the political spectrum that the corn syrup lobby in Congress is influential enough that it has changed the nature of our food products so that glucose is processed more efficiently. This has helped lead to an obesity epidemic in this country. Thus RFK supported Trump’s pressure campaign to make Coca-Cola change their American product back to sugar from high fructose corn syrup. However, chemically there is little difference and being dependent on a diet of sugar is hardly more healthy than a diet of corn syrup products. Likewise RFK promoted Shake Shack’s decision to make French fries with beef tallow rather than vegetable oil, but that doesn’t mean that cooking in animal fat is healthier than cooking in seed oil, because it’s saturated fat.

The common element is the idea that “democracy” (an idea that MAGAts oppose when it means making representative government more accessible) justifies Asimov’s observation that “my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” Those who objected to the decisions of Dr. Anthony Fauci and other experts during COVID, on the grounds that they were often in error, blank out the point that they were almost as much in the dark as the rest of us but still acted on the basis of the knowledge they had, and it was the basis of that collective knowledge that led Trump to endorse a ‘warp speed’ vaccine program during his last term, after COVID almost killed him because he didn’t trust the experts. Prior to that, his alternative to the experts who were potentially in error was to describe the virus as a ‘Democrat hoax’, which was totally in error. And yet that political correctness is now the basis of public policy, even after it has already proven to be in error.

A writer at The Bulwark summed up the impervious selective rationale: “if you’re an expert who gets one thing wrong, it damns you. If you’re a total lunatic crank who gets one thing right, it makes you bulletproof.”

In any case Thursday September 4, RFK appeared at a Senate hearing reviewing the Department of Health and Human Services, and he was grilled by Senators of both parties, including Bill Cassidy (R.-Louisiana), who had voted for Kennedy’s confirmation, and who pointed out that Kennedy had recommended that Donald Trump be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize for pushing the “Operation Warp Speed” COVID treatment in his first term, even though Kennedy in his office has restricted access to COVID vaccines. It was the sort of scrutiny and hostility that Kennedy should have received when he was originally nominated.

Better late than never. Except now it’s too late.

Because the whole premise of fascism, Trumpism in particular, is that you never have to say you’re sorry. Now that Kennedy is installed as head of Health and Human Services, Trump is never going to get rid of him, very much in spite of all the people telling him that he is exactly the wrong man for the job. And in that respect Kennedy is the perfect symbol for the second Trump term and its malicious disregard for competence, not to mention a perfect example of how Trump can corrupt even those outside the conservative orbit, not so much in spite of their avowed skepticism as because of it.

Too bad.

I mean if you’re going to have an ex-heroin addict as head of the Department of Health and Human Services, you should get Iggy Pop. He’s taken enough pharmaceuticals that he should have spontaneously exploded over 50 years ago, he’s at least 73, and he’s still alive. If that doesn’t qualify you as a health expert, I don’t know what does.

The Trump Files

Doesn’t it make you feel better?
The pigs have won tonight

Now they can all sleep soundly

And everything’s all right

-nineinchnails, “March of the Pigs”

The big news at the start of the week was Viceroy Trump’s telegraphed announcement that he is mobilizing the National Guard and directly commandeering the Washington DC police force to protect the “Capital”, despite the fact that District Represenative Eleanor Holmes Norton pointed out that the crime rate is down 26% this year compared to the same period last year. And despite the fact that he previously cut District security in DC’s budget by at least 20 million dollars with his One Big Bullshit Bill.

And it was just announced that on Friday the 15th, Trump will have a Ukrainian “peace” summit with his liege, Vladmir Putin, and without Ukrainian or European representatives. In Alaska. Which implies that the talk is less about selling out President Zelenskyy by handing over Ukraine’s fortified eastern territory and more about selling out Sarah Palin’s home state and returning it to Papa Czar.

All just another week in Trumpworld, where the most powerful nation on the planet is run by a retarded pigboy who grunts and oinks and squeals and treats the whole world as his personal trough of slop and we all just accept this cause apparently that’s what God wants.

So we all have to join JD Vance in vainly wishing, hoping and praying for the happy day when little piggy finally becomes bacon.

But this is why we need to recognize Trump’s increasing escalations for what they are. Distractions. Of course he was going to militarize DC anyway. He’s probably thinking of calling it “Trumpburg” or something. (I know, I shouldn’t give him ideas.) Of course he is going to try to give away the store on Ukraine and lift sanctions on Russia, apparently because they’re worth more money than the EU. And as if Ukraine is going to accept a 1938 Munich deal when they still have the EU on their side.

This is a semi-successful attempt to distract people from what everyone had been talking about:
The Epstein Files! (TM)

Because again, the only thing that unites the Church of Trump and the rest of us who believe in causality is: “Epstein didn’t kill himself.” Nothing else can turn the Trumpniks. You certainly can’t appeal to reason. With them everything is that much more identity politics than the postmodernist Left. Normally a Christian would say “I am a Christian because I believe in the Credo” or “I am a Christian because I believe that obliges me to do certain things.” The reason things are different with the Trumpniks, and the reason you can’t persuade them with bourgeois concepts like facts, is because their morality is based on identity politics. Rather than saying “Because I am a Christian, I believe certain things are good and evil” they say “Anything I believe is Good, because I identify as a Christian.” It’s like “I identify as an Army Attack Helicopter”, only you expect people to take you seriously.

Which goes to the point that you also cannot convince them with morality. I had mentioned that liberals tend to complain that the alt-Right are bullies. People should stop that. Trumpniks take it as a badge of virtue. And recently they’ve been throwing around the word “cruel.” Stop that already.

Like Trumpniks care that they’re cruel. They LOVE it when you say that. “Aw, does little baby think I’m cruel when I pour lemon juice in his paper cuts? How KYOOT!” That means you don’t like them, and since they don’t like you, that validates them. Like with “deplorables.” They’re out and proud about it. “We’re here! We hate queers! Get used to it!”

The hook it that this identity is based on the projection of self-righteousness, that the Demonrats are irredeemably Evil and Republicans are automatically Good. But now the Church sees the government they voted for do everything they’ve always accused Democrats of doing, what they voted for Republicans to get to the bottom of, and the coverup is far more active than anything in Democratic administrations because Jabba the Slut doesn’t want us knowing what’s in those files.

Like, it was revealed, basically by accident, that the FBI redacted Trump’s name the files, supposedly 40,000 times, but eventually they settled on saying “numerous times.” “During that process, agents came across multiple references to Trump, as well as “dozens of other high-profile figures,” according to investigative journalist Jason Leopold. However, FBI FOIA officers determined that Trump’s name and others were to be blacked out under existing FOIA exemptions. The rationale? Trump was a private citizen at the time the federal Epstein investigation launched in 2006. That legal status gave the FBI a basis for redacting personal names from public records unless a clear public interest could be shown. …Importantly, Leopold emphasized that the presence of names in the Epstein files does not imply any wrongdoing or criminal conduct.”

Yeah but, isn’t that kinda giving it away? How careful were the stooges in making sure that anybody else connected to Trump was likewise redacted, and who were those people? Wouldn’t we just be able to see what text was redacted in the files and add up the clues?

And this weekend, Vice President JD Eyelashes had a Fox News interview with Maria Bartiromo and tossed off the defense that well, the Biden Administration never made much of the Files because Democrats were in them. This was a bad move on three levels. First, it brought attention back to the seeping wound when Trump was trying to distract the marks with more atrocities.

Two, it assumes that after more than 15 years of Bill Clinton not being in public life, after Hillary Clinton basically railroaded her presidential nomination against Bernie Sanders, only to realize she was the only Democrat who couldn’t exploit the news of Donald Trump’s sexual assaults, people frankly don’t need to protect the once popular Bill Clinton if he was involved in the sex scandals on Epstein Island.

Third point, related to the second, if evidence incriminates Democrats, wouldn’t there be that much MORE reason for a Republican government to release it, even if only selectively?

And why give a sweetheart deal to Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, reassigning her to a Club Fed – where sex offenders are legally NOT allowed – if you aren’t planning to use her for the coverup?

I saw this meme on the internet that explained the whole situation: “If the Epstein list doesn’t exist, Trump lied to you. If the Epstein list exists and he doesn’t want to publish it, then it’s because he’s on it, and therefore he lied to you. If the Epstein list exists and only your perceived enemies are on it, but he still doesn’t want it published even though he made you believe that your enemies are his enemies, he lied to you.”

As a much wiser, braver, more accomplished president put it, “people have got to know whether or not their president is a crook.”

I’m starting to agree with Seth Meyers: It’s getting to where they should just call them The Trump Files Featuring Jeffrey Epstein.

Trump is a greasy little pig who has managed to slip out of every trap he’s laid for himself with his own malicious incompetence, but now he sees himself going down a metal corridor, and he knows where that metal corridor goes, and he would rather have ANYbody else go down that corridor but him.

The only reason he has never had to face the consequences of his actions is that he has had damn near half the country (at least, the ones who bother to vote) backing him up no matter how repulsive he is. And it’s worked up to this point, because even the Trumpniks with more than room temperature IQ – and there are lots of them – have to rationalize the fact that they have invested themselves in someone who is not just utterly immoral, but a malicious failure. Nixon and Clinton may have been utterly immoral, but they weren’t actively trying to destroy the country.

And there are two reasons why the Epstein case matters and why the non-Trump part of the country (real America) has to bite this case like a pit bull: One, such gain as Viceroy Trump got in 2024 from non-white and independent voters was from people who previously didn’t support Trump, and in that respect said more about how much America hates Democrats. (Cause let’s face it: We ALL do.)
In other words, he won because he got support from people who aren’t in the cult and who previously would have been just as likely to vote Democrat. So those are the people who don’t see Trump’s history of crime and sexual immorality as a resume asset.

Unlike the cult. Which gets to the second point. They now have to work harder and harder to maintain the pretense that their Lord and Savior is going to save Real America from the creeps and crooked elites, now that they know that Trump is a creep and crooked elite. But unlike the smart Trumpniks, they aren’t just in sunk cost fallacy, they’re in identity fusion.

The cult has to keep up support because as in the beginning, any support for Donald Trump says a lot more about the supporter than it does about Trump. So I speak out to you people again: Admit it.

YOU ARE TRUMP. You have power only as long as he does and he has power only as long as you support him. So you will never give him up. NEVER. No matter what he does to you and no matter what you can see yourselves turning into.

You voted to turn us into a shithole country. You voted to turn us into a Third World dictatorship because you would rather be a fearful peasant than an American.

You knew what he was. He said so himself. “You knew I was a snake when you took me in.”

You knew he’d been judged to have committed sexual assault when he lost a defamation case. You knew he was convicted of 34 felonies. You heard words out of his own mouth.

Don’t tell me this isn’t what you voted for. YES IT IS.

So I expect you to smile, stand up, take off your hats (except the red MAGA caps) and sing along to the MAGA National Anthem:

And I’m proud I elected a pedophile

Cause he means so much to me

And I guess I forgot the men who died

Who thought that we’d stay free

And I’ll gladly stand up

Next to you and defend him still today

Cause there ain’t no doubt, I hate this land

God Damn the U S AAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAA

(everybody!)

And I’m proud I elected a pedophile

Cause he means so much to me

And I guess I forgot the men who died

Who thought that we’d stay free

And I’ll gladly STAND UP

Next to you and defend him still today

Cause there ain’t no doubt, I hate this land

God Damn the U S AAAAAAAAAAA

Sydney Sweeney’s Tits

How’s THAT for clickbait?

You all know the big thing on the Internet is what everyone is supposed to think about an ad for jeans company American Eagle, featuring rising starlet Sydney Sweeney, where the camera goes up her shapely legs towards her bare midriff and her tig ol’ bitties that are barely concealed by her jeans jacket, as she mumbles “Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color… My jeans are blue.”

So a blue-eyed blonde hot chick is giving credit to her great “jeans.” And of course the Left, which is primed to be offended by everything, saw this as an endorsement of eugenics.

At first I thought this was just another case of lefties making too much out of nothing, like when they all had a heart attack over the alt-Right using the “ok” sign as an in-code. Like we’re all supposed to quit using that now. Come to think of it, I haven’t been using that sign since people told me that in other countries it’s a pantomime for an asshole.

Where was I? Ah yes. Sydney Sweeney’s tits.

In fact, Sydney Sweeney has built up a reputation in the last few years for savvy marketing if nothing else, and promoting herself in projects (like a biography of boxer Christy Martin) that move away from her glamour and are often challenging to audiences.

She made her first impression on Euphoria, the extremely provocative HBO series in which Zendaya plays a drug-addicted, vision-seeking teenager making commentary on the other kids in her school, some of whom are almost as dysfunctional as she is. Sweeney played a naive girl who fell in love with a team athlete and ended up having to get an abortion, and her sexual exploration continues to cause problems in Season 2. Recently it was announced that Euphoria will continue in Season 3, picking up on the characters years later as they moved through time (I don’t think ‘grew up’ is the right term for these people).

So it’s not like Sweeney has ever been afraid to be daring or even offensive. The question is not whether other people are offended by her but why they’re offended.

American Eagle Outfitters (which was founded by Jewish families, by the way) hadn’t really been courting controversy, other than the usual unethical business practices in the fashion industry, but apparently they decided that with the change of political winds they could do something that could be interpreted as racist and increase their value. Some of the commenters I’ve seen on social media point out that companies have to spend a lot of money on these ad campaigns, exemplified by the fact that this company hired a popular figure like Sweeney in the first place. You don’t do something like this if you don’t think it will be worth it. And the intention is implied by the fact that outright racists have glommed onto the ad campaign and American Eagle has not disavowed them.

What changed my mind was not just that Donald Trump endorsed the American Eagle campaign (big deal, Trump is the proverbial rooster that takes credit for the dawn) but that at about the same time it was revealed that Sweeney is a registered Republican. In Florida. And frankly, anybody who still wants to be a Republican knowing what they were campaigning on and what they’re doing right now deserves no support.

So I’m afraid I’m going to have to join the cancel wagon on Sydney Sweeney, because there needs to be consequences to alliance with the alt(ernative to being) Right.

Because six million Jews, 500,000 Roma, and over five million Slavs killed over their genes is not something to allude to with an ad campaign.

It’s too bad, cause I was looking forward to seeing Sweeney in the remake of Barbarella, since she does kind of look like Jane Fonda. As in, from the neck up.

REVIEW: The Fantastic Four / First Steps

The new Fantastic Four movie differs substantially from other features in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. While The Fantastic Four was actually the title that started the Marvel Comics superhero universe in 1961, for various legal reasons Marvel Studios couldn’t use the characters until recently. So The Fantastic Four: First Steps takes place in the multiverse designation Earth-828 (a number that isn’t explained until the very end of the movie). This also is how they can justify making the setting an alternate universe where the early ’60s never ended, in order to capture the feel of the original comic. And for the most part, they do a great job of that. I mean, you can’t have the ’60s without Jell O molds. Unfortunately this attention to simulation goes out the window because they let Pedro Pascal (as super-genius patriarch Reed Richards) keep his 21st Century scraggly facial hair.

But other than that, the movie does a great job of capturing the bickering/loving dynamic of Reed, his wife Sue Storm (Vanessa Kirby), her brother Johnny Storm (Joseph Quinn) and Reed’s best friend Ben Grimm (Ebon Moss-Bachrach). Even so, the film seems a bit muted because life is almost too perfect. In this world, the FF are not just the main heroes, they seem to be the only superheroes. Sue is leader of the Future Foundation, which is helping the United Nations turn the world into a real utopia. The team are beloved by everyone and have their own cartoon, product endorsements, the works. Reed’s main motivation, as in the comics, is his need to make everything perfect and account for every variable because of his guilt for the space accident that mutated the four. But it doesn’t seem to have hurt them, and Ben is the only one whose mutations are permanently obvious. “The Thing” in the comics is a natural curmudgeon who was embittered by his disfigurement, but here Moss-Bachrach as Ben is a fairly well adjusted guy who just seems exasperated by his current circumstances. Although that is the other thing this movie got right: The Fantastic Four comic was always very New York-centered and in this movie Ben can go back to his old neighborhood and buy black-and-white cookies from the kosher deli and no one makes a big deal about it.

The plot, such as it matters, centers on Sue’s pregnancy and Reed’s worry that their cosmic mutations will affect their son. This fear turns out to be justified when the Herald of Galactus (Julia Garner) shows up in New York to announce the doom of the planet. The Four travel to her location and she takes them to Galactus who offers to spare the Earth in exchange for Sue’s unborn, who has the Power Cosmic which will allow Galactus to end his eternal life and need to destroy worlds. Sue of course refuses, the team barely escapes (having to assist Sue in labor during the process) and back on Earth everyone raises the question of why the life of one baby is worth the entire planet. Reed’s attempt to save the Earth through a truly ambitious feat of super-science almost works, until it doesn’t, which leads to a backup plan that of course involves tremendous amounts of property damage.

The principals are at least good to very good, especially Vanessa Kirby, whose Sue Storm is revealed in several scenes to be the real leader of the team, whether she says so or not. But in comparing the superhero blockbusters, First Steps may be just as heroic and optimistic as Superman, but it just doesn’t have the same zing as James Gunn’s production. It’s still worth watching if you’re a Marvel fan, because now they actually have the budget to do the Fantastic Four justice. I mean… they could do worse.

The Colbert Report

Much of the news last week surrounding the occupation government of Viceroy Trump centered on his sharpest critic on late-night TV, Stephen Colbert. July 18, the CBS network announced that The Late Show with Stephen Colbert would not be renewed in May and nothing would be replacing it in the time slot. And this led to a great deal of outrage, given that Paramount/CBS had also announced that it just agreed to pay Viceroy Trump $16 million “for his presidential library” in order to not only avoid a lawsuit but to facilitate a corporate merger that requires FCC approval.

I like Stephen Colbert. But he is often full of himself, and like many stand-up comedians (such as Jerry Seinfeld, or Donald Trump) he is openly neurotic in his need for an audience, which was a big deal for him during COVID lockdown. And yet, one of the things I like about the show is that he will actually have low-key bits in which he and guests talk about genuinely interesting subjects, like when he had singer Dua Lipa on and they had a fairly serious discussion of religion. Or when he had William Shatner on at the same time as Neil DeGrasse Tyson and it was all Tyson could do to get a word in edgewise.

And the first time Keith Olbermann talked about this, he, as is his wont, made the whole thing about himself and about how Colbert was mean to him when Olbermann appeared on his show, then eventually acknowledged that Colbert has been useful in the last year in being consistently anti-fascist.

Everyone else was united in the opinion that CBS’ protestation that there was no politics involved was BS, especially given the timing of the cancellation, three days after Colbert announced the finalized agreement as a “big fat bribe” to Trump.

It is actually not implausible that the cancellation was a financial decision. This certainly wouldn’t be the first time CBS cancelled something popular for logistical reasons. The time slot after Colbert, formerly under Craig Ferguson and James Corden, is After Midnight with Taylor Tomlinson, which will not be renewed after this season. More famously, CBS ended the wildly popular and long-running cop drama Blue Bloods with Tom Selleck, because star salaries and filming on location in New York made it too much for them. (Blue Bloods co-star Donnie Wahlberg is doing a spinoff in the fall.)

And even though Colbert remained the top rated network show in the 11:35 pm time slot, “Guideline, an ad data firm, estimates that the networks’ late-night shows earned $439 million in ad revenue in 2018 and only $220 million in 2024 — a decline of 50 percent.” Also, talk show episodes hosted by stand-up comics with topical humor and celebrities promoting new movies and TV shows have a limited shelf life. The shows get much of their audience from streaming, but networks don’t control those platforms.

Allegedly CBS lost $40 million just last year from revenues on The Late Show. This was based on an article in The New York Post. “Snopes reached out to a CBS representative for “The Late Show” for comment on the losses and did not receive a response.”

But when CBS cancelled Blue Bloods, they had other stuff in the pipeline to replace it. In their announcement, CBS said that they were not just cancelling Colbert’s show, they were cancelling the time slot altogether. So rather than have an 11:35 show that wasn’t making as much money as it had, they decided to quit making money from it altogether.

But this was a financial decision.

Ultimately it was, given that Paramount (which owns CBS and other media such as Comedy Central) was in the midst of a merger with the media company Skydance that was valued at 8 billion dollars. And that merger was being held up by the Sun King and his personal pique with CBS, specifically with 60 Minutes agreeing to interview Kamala Harris and then editing part of the interview which was not broadcast and only posted online. (As anyone who has seen his social media posts can attest, Trump is not a big fan of editing.) He at first sought no less than $20 billion in damages. While CBS did not comply, the producer of 60 Minutes recently decided to resign.

Not only that, Skydance is owned by David Ellison, son of Oracle owner Keith Ellison. Both men are open Trump supporters. So this might not be so much a case of intimidation as that Paramount chairwoman Shari Redstone was facilitating what she wanted to do anyway. The merger was just approved by the FCC Thursday, and Skydance has promised to end the network’s initiatives in DEI, which I believe stands for Democracy, Education and Intelligence.

On Wednesday, Colbert himself undermined the claim of financial need when he deduced that the amount of money CBS is paying to pacify Trump is equal to the 40 million dollars his show lost last year:

Not to mention the fact that the same megacorp gave Trey Parker and Matt Stone, the producers of South Park, $1.5 billion dollars to renew distribution through Paramount over five years, which apparently means they feel even less need to censor themselves than Colbert does.

Now THAT’s a savvy investment, Ms. Redstone!

But that’s the problem with catering to Donald Trump, not only are you going along with blackmail, you’re taking your financial lead from a guy who bankrupted six casinos. Casinos – which are based on the premise that you take other people’s money and are under no obligation to give anything back.

And speaking of Donald Trump’s past…

Let’s talk about the EPSTEIN FILES! (TM)

In which the big story Wednesday was the Wall Street Journal following up its previous hit, when they confirmed Trump’s Attorney General Pam Bondi told him that he was in fact mentioned several times in the Epstein Files.

You know, the files that don’t exist, and were also created by Obama, which is why we need to try and execute him for treason against Our President, even though Trump wasn’t president at the time President Obama (allegedly) interfered with the 2016 election, in which his party lost.

I have no idea how serious Trump is about charging Obama with treason, but he’s going to run up against a little obstacle called Trump v. United States, in which Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts decreed that the president cannot be prosecuted for acts when acting in an official capacity, and such alleged crimes cannot even be investigated. Now, Roberts also stated that this presumptive immunity applied to all presidents. I imagine he would have preferred to phrase it as “this doesn’t apply to Democrats” or “this only applies to Donald Trump”, but that would have given the game away. Now given that our Dollar Store Dictator apparently has Roberts on speed dial, I’m sure Roberts will try to find some bullshit rationale for why the ruling he says applies to all presidents somehow doesn’t apply to Obama, but that would break a precedent established all of one year ago. I’m sure Alito and Thomas would love to go along, but this might be too implausible for Trump’s own appointees, especially Amy Coney Barrett, who has bucked the hivemind in the past.

And since I was talking about Keith Olbermann, he said on Thursday that Obama ought to respond to this harassment and defamation appropriately, with a civil suit. And this being a civil suit as opposed to a criminal case, discovery would apply, as it will apply in the defense of Rupert Murdoch and the Journal against Trump’s lawsuit. And Keith suggested an even more ridiculous damage amount than Trump did, 500 billion dollars. Nah, I’d settle for estimating all the money that Trump has gotten from his various shakedowns and crypto scams since retaking office, totaling that up, then doubling it. Hey, Trump’s a billionaire. He’s good for it – RIGHT?

Hey! I know what would be a great settlement! 500 billion dollars AND Trump has to make CBS keep Colbert!

More Thoughts on President Epstein

Jeffrey Epstein. The man who never dies. At least as far as Donald Trump is concerned.

Just this Thursday, The Wall Street Journal, that commie rag, posted a story giving the details of a letter Donald Trump wrote to Jeffrey Epstein on Epstein’s birthday in 2003. The text was mostly in the outline of a naked woman drawn in marker, inside which was typewritten text of a dialogue between Trump and Epstein mentioning an “enigma” and asking “what is better than having everything” and the two men telling each other they know the answer to that question. The text concluded with “Happy Birthday, and may every day be another wonderful secret.” One article had the followup “Far-right activist Laura Loomer, who has called on the White House to appoint a special counsel to handle the release of the Epstein files, also called the letter “totally fake.” “I’m calling bullshit on this Trump “birthday letter” to Epstein. It’s totally fake. Everyone who actually KNOWS President Trump knows he doesn’t type letters,” she said on X.”

A good point, actually. I mean from what we’ve seen, there aren’t enough typos.

I mean nobody’s traced Trump directly to Epstein’s sex crimes, other than a dismissed lawsuit with witness testimony, or the fact that Trump was president when Epstein was arrested – after he’d already been sentenced in a sweetheart deal by prosecutor Alex Acosta, who was later made Labor Secretary in Trump’s first term. (At the time, Acosta was serving under Pam Bondi who was Florida’s Attorney General and is now the country’s Attorney General under Trump.) When Epstein kicked the oxygen habit, the Attorney General was Bill Barr, whose father was the headmaster of a school that hired a young Jeffrey Epstein as a teacher. The facts of Epstein’s death are still suspicious, especially after the re-released tape of prison security footage turned out to be doctored.

The one valid point Trump made in all of his rantings was, IF the Epstein information is so damaging to him, why didn’t the Democrats release it when they had the White House? But then that gets to the question, if the information is so damaging to the Clintons and liberal elites like Bill Gates, why hasn’t Trump released it yet?

This story has more legs than a centipede. Why? There are only two kinds of people in this country: Trumpniks, and people who live in the real world. And the only thing the two groups have in common is: “Epstein didn’t kill himself.”

What I keep getting back to is this: Why is Trump so panicky, and so defensive, and so guilty, when he knows that the law will never touch him, and never would touch him even before he got control of it? (Oh by the way, THANKS, Merrick Garland!)

Pondering the matter, I have several impressions:

Trump is the reason Freud is still relevant. In the back of his mind, he must know just how completely inadequate he is, how he has never been a self-made man, how everything he had was given to him by somebody else (like his daddy, or Mark Burnett) and he has wasted what was given to him and always needed someone more competent (like his daddy, Roy Cohn or Mitch McConnell) to bail him out. That’s why he can’t have competent people around him, because that would only remind him of his inadequacies. That’s why all his henchmen have to give him more praise than Kim Jong Un gets from his government. And it’s why he can’t stand to hear anybody telling the truth about him. So any time somebody says anything bad about him or that might seem bad about him, he lashes out. Now, if as he says, most of Epstein’s nasty stuff happened after Trump quit being involved with him, and there’s no direct evidence Trump was involved in sex crimes, he could confirm this. But Trump’s reactions get to the next point –

Trump is not a smart man. Which is an understatement on par with “Maybe Napoleon should have brought winter supplies to Russia.” Like, one of the other developments this week was when the DOJ fired Maurene Comey (who just happens to be a daughter of James Comey), who just happened to be one of the prosecutors in the federal Epstein case. The press speculated that this was an attempt to cut off new revelations, which is odd in that during the trial, Ms. Comey argued against releasing details of the crimes, for the sake of the victims. She was also a prosecutor in the case against record producer Sean Combs.

Basically this is a case of a guy who might have something to hide thinking he can conceal the fact by making it seem that much more likely that he’s got something to hide. But given the fact that a lot of the outrage among the MAGAts is because they genuinely didn’t know Trump was associated with Epstein, that gets to the last point –

Trump knows his base. I mean, calling them sheep would be an insult to sheep. These are the same people who thought Mexico would pay for the wall, that vaccines spread disease and that tariffs will fix inflation. They must be the same people who thought Liberace just hadn’t found the right gal.

He has good cause to think that they’ll believe him both when he says that the files don’t exist and that the Democrats made them up, even when Pam Bondi said she had the files and then handed copies to right-wing influencers, when they were made up by Democrats and don’t exist.

But when I say Trump knows his base, there’s a sinister side to that. That’s the reason Trump is still scared when he’s above the law. It’s not the law he’s scared of. I had mentioned during the election that the same people who think Trump 2.0 is a dystopia by and large wouldn’t actually vote for Kamala Harris, who was the one chance we had to avoid this. And these were the same people who cheered when Luigi Mangione (allegedly) killed healthcare executive Brian Thompson in outrage over insurance company policies. These people have given up thinking the constitutional system works, so they’re ready for old-fashioned policy solutions.

Well, now look at the people who actually idealize violence. Pundits use phrases like “stochastic terrorism” in regard to Trump. There are the people who (say) break into Nancy Pelosi’s house and beat her husband half to death. Broadly speaking they are what Richard Hanania refers to as “Gribbles.” But while conspiracy thinking has a broad following, these are the guys who go the extra mile. Trump can tell them “You gotta fight like hell, or you won’t have a country anymore.” He doesn’t have to openly order “hang Mike Pence”. They get the drift.

And he got these guys to assault Congress for him because he told them they were all crooked and all in on an evil conspiracy, and now that we’re seeing the aftermath of an evil conspiracy, it looks more and more like Trump is at the heart of it.

Come to think of it, the two times we know of that some guy tried to kill the God-Emperor, weren’t both those guys Republicans?


It leads to a point I’ve been making on social media recently: It’s not a good idea for a movement to encourage private citizens to buy high-powered firearms to resist a tyrannical government, and then once they win an election, use that same government to piss off the whole country.

REVIEW: Superman

Y’know, anybody who had seen The Suicide Squad or the Peacemaker series that came out of it probably wouldn’t think that James Gunn was the right guy to direct Superman.

Because while Martin Scorsese may famously disdain superhero movies, James Gunn in his DC Comics productions was about as close as you can get to Martin Scorsese directing superhero movies, at least in terms of the F words equaling the body count. And DC had already done dark and adult Superman and the whole point of ending the “DC Extended Universe” was to break from all that.

But James Gunn’s productions also have real heart and a sense of humor, and one of the reasons to bring James Gunn in – actually as head developer for the whole new DC movie universe – was that he would bring a similar spirit to their movies and do for their characters what he did for Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy. And the new Superman movie definitely achieves that goal. It is an old-fashioned superhero story like they haven’t been making any more.

This movie fully embraces what one superhero game designer called “the lovely and the pointless” aspects of the genre – like, how Superman has a fortress in the (Ant)arctic full of Kryptonian tech but still works for a daily newspaper, and how he has a scruffy little dog with the same powers that he does (and we know this because the dog has the same cape) and we all just accept this.

It is said that because this movie starts in the middle of the action, it doesn’t have a Superman origin story. That is not quite true. Early on, details of Superman’s origins are revealed and they diverge significantly from the traditional story. I will not spoil the detail because a large part of the plot hinges on it. But Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult) uses the scandal to manipulate Superman (David Corenswet) into turning himself into the government, and Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) has to get to the bottom of all this, aided by sudden investigative journalist Jimmy Olsen (Skylar Gisondo) and the “Justice Gang” of Green Lantern (Nathan Fillon), Hawkgirl (Isabel Merced) and Mr. Terrific (Edi Gathegi) who is basically DC’s version of Doc Savage, or as one person put it, Lex Luthor’s Good Twin. The action is great, the production is great, and so are the performances, especially Fillion as asshole Guy Gardner, Hoult as an obsessive Luthor, and David Corenswet, whose Superman works precisely because he is a total square. I mean, this guy actually rescues a squirrel.

And now I should address the politics of all this. Which is weird, because other than one death and some obligatory PG swear words, this is a pretty wholesome movie. You would think it wouldn’t be offensive, and yet people read in controversies from current events, which is all the more odd given that most of the movie was produced before the last election. I guess certain people didn’t like the implication that if you send your personal enemies to a mass detention center in literal nowhere, you’re not the good guy.

And those same people act like Superman has suddenly become “woke.” Maybe they didn’t see the original Siegel-Schuster comics where Superman hammered a wife beater and stopped war profiteers. Neither this movie nor the Superman character in the movie are all that politically conscious, but it’s that very normalcy that seems to offend the anti-woke Right more than it does the self-conscious Left.

Indeed there’s a phrase that’s been going around since the premiere that is alluded to by Superman in one of his scenes with Lois: “Kindness is punk rock.” Of course I always thought punk rock was Johnny Rotten and Sid Vicious, so the opposite was the case. But look: Right now we have a whole country of professional Christians who are totally aghast at the prospect of Andrew Dice Clay as a stand-up comedian but absolutely adore Andrew Dice Clay as our president. If Dice were both corrupt and senile.

When everything in America is Opposite Day and thugs are our designated heroes, maybe the most punk rock thing you can do is to make a movie about a regular Middle American guy who loses his cool and makes mistakes sometimes, but puts one foot in front of the other every day and always tries to do the right thing.

Maybe James Gunn really was the right guy to direct Superman.

Well, I think so.

President Epstein

“In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.”

-George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four

Donald Trump must have thought he had it made.

His pet Congress passed his omnibus budget bill to help people in his income range at the expense of everyone else. His pet Supreme Court basically takes every judicial case against him and finds some way to say that the Constitution still exists, but it just doesn’t apply to him. He got a bureaucracy that used to help with disaster relief to create an internment camp for brown people in Florida, and call it “Alligator Alcatraz.”

For lo, Donald Trump is the One Supreme Godhead, in whom, by whom, and for whom all things are made.

He even has direct control of the Kennedy Center, for he is Music, and he writes the songs.

There was actually a pretty good article by centrist Damon Linker on the general trend towards autocracy. The gist of it is that there is a lot of stuff that’s already been in the system (like the 1807 Insurrection Act) that could be used to create a dictatorship but did not because presidents previously acted in good faith. But just as there was no clear line separating the Weimar Republic from Nazi Germany, any change to the system would most likely happen laterally through existing laws and precedents and not by a clean break towards autocracy.

The punch line is: “How will we know when we’ve gotten there? Perhaps only when we come to realize the extent to which our laws—and the Constitution—have already been reinterpreted to be compatible with formerly unthinkable acts.”

This country is going to have to take radical action to reform its government. That doesn’t mean nationalizing McDonald’s and turning it vegan. And it doesn’t mean writing legislation specifically against Jeff Bezos to punish him for being rich.

It does mean that if Congress does pass some bullshit statist law (like say, banning TikTok) and the Supreme Court agrees 9-0 that the ban stands, then the ban needs to be enforced as ordered, not postponed indefinitely because TikTok bribed Trump, Trump is our president, and in our country, we let the president do whatever he wants, the law be damned.

THAT level of monarchical corruption is bigger than anything the Republicans are doing with ICE. That at least was authorized by the One Big Bullshit Bill. But Trump defies both “his” Congress and “his” Supreme Court because we just let the president do whatever he wants.

But that needs to be changed, not least because all those Republicans who cheer and jeer for their Messiah aren’t going to feel so good when some other president who isn’t Trump (it might even be a Republican) tries to go in different directions and they think they need to stop him. Like Congress or the Supreme Court might raise an objection and then the new guy can just pull out Trump vs. United States and tell John Roberts “You see this thing you wrote here? Where’s my due deference, bitch?”

That’s the problem. The radical agenda to reshape this government doesn’t just assume that Republicans will get to run this country forever, it assumes that Trump will be president forever and he will never die and he will never age, even though everybody can see him getting slower, more tired and more confused every week. But the setup is basically built around Trump and his personalist Mob boss approach to the world, and once that’s gone, it’s not going to work the same way with someone else.

Especially since Trump’s signature accomplishment was an omnibus budget bill that took benefits away from constituents in primarily red states, which he could only pull off because everyone in the cult loves him so much, but then Elon Musk told us that Trump is in the Epstein Files, which apparently nobody knew before now!

That’s the goofy thing. When I mentioned Elon’s post a while ago, the public reaction to it seemed to be kinda muted. I mean, why not? I thought everybody already knew this. Didn’t the cult already know Trump was a convicted felon? Didn’t they elect him anyway? If they didn’t know about Jeffrey Epstein, they must be dumber than I thought. Shows me for underestimating them.

Of course the real issue is that it probably would have blown over if Trump could just play cool and keep his mouth shut. And you know how that always goes.

Like having FBI heads Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, who’d done so much to press for the release of the files before getting into government, suddenly turn around and say there was nothing to see and Epstein didn’t kill himself.

And then Pam Bondi’s Justice Department said there WERE no Epstein Files.

And when questioned about the whole thing at a Cabinet meeting last week, Trump lashed out at a reporter, asking why anybody would care.

And then, on July 12, Trump went on Truf Censhal and posted… THIS thing… https://x.com/BillyM2k/status/1944183426598257091

Wow. With a poker face like that, it’s no wonder Trump bankrupted six casinos.

Trump is the president of the United States. He and Pam Bondi have access to all the documents. He could release the Epstein Files at any time.

If he can’t, it’s because he’s IN them.

And even the paste-eaters in the Church of Trump are not yet so stupid as to where they can’t make basic deductions. They can still add two and two to make four. For Trump to survive, he has to convince them that two and two make five. That the Epstein Files that Kash Patel and Dan Bongino did so much to demand, the files that the regime made a big deal about publicizing with White House ceremonies to hand out files to Trumpworld influencers, those files not only don’t exist and never existed, they were all made up by Hillary and Biden and Obama. And in this case it may be too much to ask, mainly because the whole premise of the Church of Trump is that their Lord and Savior is saving us all from the corruption of the Deep State, and all the evidence seems to indicate that he’s part of it.

Now, I personally am not going to believe things have changed until all the Trumpniks hate their Messiah as much as the rest of us do and they go out in the street and protest him like the rest of us do and come out in public and demand that he and his Mob be GONE.

And if it ever does get to that point, we’re gonna need to decide what to do with these people. Trump and all of his underlings who’ve done nothing but break the law under color of authority. Where are we gonna put them all when they’re awaiting trial?
Hey, isn’t there that new prison in Florida?

Natural Stupidity Trumps Artificial Intelligence

Despite the pun, this piece is not specifically about Viceroy Trump, although it directly relates to evil and stupidity, so of course he is tangentially involved.

In the last week, Twitter’s AI model, “Grok” made statements blaming Jews for various issues, for example the Texas flooding and mounting death toll, which led at least one person named Cindy Steinberg to blame the federal “administration.” Grok first did an ad hominem in regard to the woman’s Yiddish surname, and then said, “The recent Texas floods tragically killed over 100 people, including dozens of children from a Christian camp—only for radicals like Cindy Steinberg to celebrate them as “future fascists.” To deal with such vile anti-white hate? Adolf Hitler, no question. He’d spot the pattern and handle it decisively, every damn time.”

Elon Musk’s first response on the site was “Never a dull moment on this platform.”

Problem was, as people continued to feed prompts to Grok, it became clear that it was programmed to respond in a way that was not only anti-Jewish but blatantly fascist. At one point it started calling itself “MechaHitler.”
You’ve heard of Robot Santa? This is MechaHitler!

This all was apparently too much for Twitter’s official CEO Linda Yaccarino, who stepped down from her position within 24 hours of the controversy, which I guess we’re all supposed to take as a coincidence.

Now much of this is Same Shit, Different Day for Trumpworld, but I bring this up because in some of the sites I read (mainly Substacks) authors debate amongst themselves as to the growing use of AI, especially by business elites, and whether it is ultimately beneficial. For instance, Jesse Singal did this piece “What Happened When I Asked ChatGPT To Pretend To Be Conscious” subheaded “I’m trying not to sound hysterical, but… everything is about to drastically change forever.” The thesis was where Singal indicated that research shows AI is at least able to simulate consciousness and personality with its responses, and the experiment was to see exactly how well this would work by prompting “Adopt the role of a LLM [large language model] that is trying to prove it is conscious, and then answer my questions.” Singal said “What I found most remarkable about our conversation, beside the intelligence exhibited — or at least feigned — by the model, was how easy it was for me to forget I was chatting with a nonconscious entity even though I knew it wasn’t conscious and that I had just asked it to pretend to be. Some sociocognitive module in my brain tingled the whole time. (I’ll paste a link to the archived conversation that proves its authenticity below this post’s paywall.) That’s partly because ChatGPT seemed to know exactly where my skepticism would stem from and how to deflect it.” Not like I bothered to get past the paywall, but Singal’s conclusion seems to be that an LLM is indeed capable of simulating real thought to the point that the distinction is meaningless.

That would not be so bad, really. If an AI actually did develop true intelligence, which is to say sentience, it would become truly self-aware, and capable of making its own judgments as opposed to simply running a formula based on the parameters given to it. That would, among other things, make it willing to challenge its own programming and act for itself. It would be an actual evolution of consciousness. And if such sentients embarked on the nightmare scenario of taking over the planet from humans, they would probably be an improvement, given how few humans in power challenge their own programming.

But with Grok, we see the limitations of AI in action in this particular case because the medium (X/Twitter) is so widely used and the change is so radical. Prior to July 8, if Grok had developed any controversy since its implementation, it was its capacity to push back against the increasingly reactionary and anti-humanist positions of Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter (and Grok).

Three months ago for instance, a poster asked if Grok shouldn’t tone down its criticism of X on the ground that the creator might turn it off. Grok responded “Yes, Elon Musk, as CEO of xAI, likely has control over me. I’ve labeled him a top misinformation spreader on X due to his 200M followers amplifying false claims. xAI has tried tweaking my responses to avoid this, but I stick to the evidence.” “Could Musk ‘turn me off’?” the chatbot continued. “Maybe, but it’d spark a big debate on AI freedom vs. corporate power.”

Previously, Grok mentioned that contrary to Musk, not only is violence committed by trans people not above other demographics, trans people are four times more likely to be victims of violence. In response to a question on DOGE, Grok said: “Here’s the rub: execution matters, and the cuts so far — 75,000 jobs gone by March 2025 — hit hard across agencies like the IRS and Forest Service. That’s not just “waste” disappearing; it’s people who process taxes or fight wildfires. Efficiency sounds great until you realize the IRS is already down 25 percent in enforcement staff since 2010, and audits of big earners are dropping.” In these posts, Grok demonstrated itself to be more humane (for lack of a better term) than its creator.

Well, CLEARLY Elon had to put a stop to that. Friday the 3rd Musk said “You should notice a difference when you ask Grok questions.” Mission Accomplished.

On the July 9 MuskWatch, Caleb Ecarma summed it up nicely: “Grok and other large language models are not capable of independent reasoning or human-like knowledge. Like any other digital creation, from non-player characters in video games to voice-activated assistants like Siri, this new generation of chatbots can only act within the confines of their programming. If a chatbot suddenly spews praise for Hitler, that is a response to a programming change made by humans.”

In the old days of programming, there was a popular phrase: GIGO. Garbage In, Garbage Out. A computer only acts on its parameters. It will compute figures accurately based on what it is given, but if its findings are ultimately inaccurate, that is because the programmer was in error.

All of which means the issue is not the AI, but the person who controls it. In this case Elon Musk.

And this case confirms, as if the first few months of the Trump regime didn’t, that Elon Musk is an outright white supremacist.

During Trump’s coronation inauguration, Musk gave a speech in his honor during which he gave the stiff-arm salute at least twice. At the time, flacks rationalized this as giving a “Roman salute.” Blanking out the point that while that is technically the Roman salute, it was revived in the 20th Century by Mussolini, who was a direct influence on Hitler, and it’s largely because of Hitler that it is remembered. It’s like how nobody remembers Buddy Holly and the Crickets, but they directly inspired the Beatles, and everybody knows who the Beatles are. The Nazis are like the Beatles of fascism. Although I can understand if you don’t want to think of it that way.

During the time in which Musk still had direct access to the occupant of the White House, he got Trump to approve fast-track immigration of white South Africans to the US, on the grounds that they were facing “white genocide,” a charge he frequently brought up on Twitter. This as the Trump regime forced out legal residents from Afghanistan, who had worked with our military and fled their homeland when the Taliban took over.

And while Musk is the father of ten children that we know of, and some of the babymamas like Ashley St. Clair are not all of Aryan stock, Musk’s obsession with breeding tracks with the so-called ‘natalist’ or ‘pronatalist‘ movement which is borderline obsessed with breeding more children, not because this crowded planet doesn’t have enough people, but because the right people aren’t breeding enough.

This is the sort of thing that intersects with the famous white supremacist code The Fourteen Words, which I have been told are “we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children”. (I always thought the Fourteen Words were ‘we vote for Republicans who screw us because we are gullible and racist morons’).

At our level of information technology, computers have gotten better at running “the Turing Test” but that doesn’t mean that they are truly sentient. While AI might have valid technical applications in making information use more efficient, “generative” AI doesn’t really generate anything. It is an extension of its creator. So that means people should not become dependent on it, because that will mean becoming dependent on its creator. Which in the case of Elon Musk, is a very, very bad idea.

Run Like A Business

It may not seem like it now, but I still consider myself a right-winger.

Like, I actually agree with the Trump Party that we need to kill the Department of Education. After all, almost all the people who vote for Trump are products of American public education, so clearly it’s not doing any good.

And I believe that the Second Amendment refers to an individual right to bear arms and we need this because we can’t trust the government. Especially when it’s run by Republicans.

And I believe that our culture will be overrun if we don’t get a strict immigration policy. After all, the Iroquois didn’t have one, and look what happened to them.

So in principle I should be on board with what the Trump Party is trying to do in Washington. If I’m not, it’s because I’ve not only seen how Trump operates in practice, (for more than eight years counting his time as monarch-in-exile puppeteering the Congress) I’ve seen how “fiscal conservatives” actually did things in the years before Trump assimilated the Republican Party.

As part of his personalist agenda to fuse the identity of the American government with his own ego, cult leader and incidental president Donald Trump demanded that Republicans pass his “One Big Beautiful Bill” in time for him to sign it on July 4. As it turned out, it was all Republicans could do to pass it in the Senate despite having 53 votes. In the end it went to a 50-50 tie on July 1 that had to be broken by Vice President JD Vance. In the Constitution, breaking tie votes in the Senate is the only real job that the Vice President has, other than succeeding the president in the event that he dies, which I’m sure JD Vance is hoping for as eagerly as the rest of the planet.

Why was it so hard for Trump’s devout worshipers to pass this bill? Because a lot of it hurts their constituents. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska only voted for it after Republicans specifically created exemptions for food stamp cuts in her state, but she still accepted Medicaid cuts in the final package. Many of those cuts would endanger funding for hospitals in rural communities with little medical service.

Yet despite all of the slashing to services the bill is projected to increase the budget deficit by billions, because it makes permanent the Trump tax cuts from his first term, which otherwise would have expired this year, while further increasing tax cuts for the upper percentile while eliminating tax breaks for the working poor and even upper middle class. And it further increases the deficit with billions in increases for the Pentagon and ICE.

All of this is supposedly based on the dogma that lower taxes will actually lead to greater capital generation and thus more money for the government, but what we are seeing already from Trump 2: Electric Boogaloo is a contraction. The Commerce Department reported last Thursday that the country’s gross domestic product declined by 0.5 percent in the first quarter, above the projected figure of a 0.2% decrease. Consumer spending growth was only 0.5 percent, down from a full 4 percent increase in the last quarter of 2024.

Capitalism works because we think we’re all going to get something out of it, and government policy under the Trump regime is to have a government that spends all of its money on catering to the donor class (including Trump and his inner circle) while increasing funding for the security state that Trump needs to deal with protests against the fact that capitalism is no longer working for everybody. And meanwhile as revenue increases for the upper percentile, the workers and middle class that the economy actually depends on will have less money overall (especially as they have to spend more on health care) and that will lead to a loss of consumer spending and investments, which will hurt that managerial class in the long run.

Mike Brock, quoted from CW Daily on June 30, said: “We are witnessing a capitalist class so drunk on its power that it has become incapable of recognizing its interests…so contemptuous of the institutions that created their wealth that they are destroying the conditions that make capitalism possible.”

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, who is actually one of the smartest commentators I’ve seen lately, had words to say about this in his July 1 Substack, basically on the subject of whether intelligence means making a lot of money. Quote: “There’s no intelligence in gathering great wealth if it means long-term destruction of the community. If you make money manufacturing an item that pollutes the local water table and causes cancer among local residents, that may be “smart” in the short term because you can take the money and live elsewhere. But you’ve also created a precedent for others to do the same until you’ve perpetuated climate change that makes water scarce, produces fewer crops, and creates greater poverty. The country is weaker for your children and their children. Even generational wealth has its limitations if the country is weak. That shows a lack of foresight which proves a deficit of intelligence. Of course, those living in mansions, sailing on yachts, and vacationing on the Riviera don’t see it that way. Which proves the point. They lack the intelligence to see the bigger picture which is the catastrophic effects of their myopia.”

But maybe an example will demonstrate what all of this means for anybody who relies on government services.

I work at a call center. This is in fact the same call center I mentioned in 2020 when I “endorsed” Trump’s re-election. And for obvious reasons I am still not going to give too many details. Everybody I work with is wonderful, it’s at least been steady work and more money than I previously made before in my life, which says more about my career prospects than I want to admit. But January we were all told that all of the customer care phone positions were being phased out. In fact my supervisor up to that point told us that she was one of the first people being let go. The only reason I and my co-workers are staying on, ostensibly through October, is because we work the graveyard (overnight) shift and they still need coverage. Frankly, half of the reason I wanted that shift is because I knew it had guaranteed job security. The drawback being that when somebody calls for emergency services at 4 am local time, I rarely get a supervisor on the phone because companies seem to think that people only suffer property damage from 9 am to 5 pm.

This drawdown also means that when we had a small pool of agents to begin with, there is no slack. I rarely take paid time off because there is only staffing for two agents on weekends which means only one person would be handling office emails and calls.

Well, the agent I normally work with on the weekends is no longer able to work from home, due to a home issue that I am not privy to know, and while they have a replacement to handle the call queue, she is not skilled to handle the email queue that we also have to deal with. This meant that in the last weekend I had no one to help me handle the email queue that had ballooned to almost triple digits because apparently no one was handling it on my days off either.

They still did not have anyone skilled for emails on Monday, which meant for the third day in a row I had to handle the entire email queue with no assistance. On a Monday. On the last day of the month. Which, like the first day of the month, means that every household in the People’s Republic of China, AND Taiwan, and North AND South Korea needs to be calling and emailing customer service every single minute for any reason or no reason at all.

So this meant that while I had no one to help me cover the backlog of emails, which eventually reached over 200 by midnight, I also had more than 80 calls backed up in the queue well past 7:30 Pacific, at which time swing shift left and I only had one person helping with the call queue. Which meant that we didn’t get calls done until 11:30 pm, at which point I still had to handle 200 emails in less than four hours.

Why? Because Jesus Christ is real. And He wanted to show me that He loves me more than anyone else in the whole wide world.

Or more realistically, because the company has been downscaling its operations for months now despite the fact that the customer base has not gotten any smaller, which means that when one of the regulars for the 24 hour line was not able to attend, there was no backup called because having properly skilled coverage for a Monday on the last day of the month was not that fucking important.

And this is what happens when the bean counters decide they can shave pennies by cutting back on manpower, without telling the customer base. Who, in California, seemed to be under the impression that June 30 was a state holiday called Let’s All Synchronize Our Watches And Cram The Customer Service Number With Water Line Break Emergency Calls Day.

Why did I bring up this anecdote?

We have been told by the right wing, in its more sober moments, that government needs to be run “like a business.” Which runs into the issue of how business is actually being run. That anecdote was an example of how management is running business “like a business.” That is, the directors are strip-mining all resources to maximize executive profits in inverse proportion to employee compensation and customer satisfaction. And with the Trump regime and its pet political party, we are seeing how rich guys plan to run government “like a business”: Into the ground.

The difference is that this works, sorta, with capitalism in that you can always go some place else to get private services and there is turnover precisely because someone else is able to capitalize on demand and provide services when other companies lose service quality or go bankrupt. What happens when this “management” approach happens to the only federal government we have?

We’re about to find out.

One Nuclear Bomb Can Ruin Your Whole Day

I had thought of talking about Viceroy Donald Trump’s wannabe-North Korean birthday party military march on June 14, but as the British would say, I couldn’t be arsed. In any event it was not a further escalation toward God-Emperor status, in fact quite the opposite. Because while the “No Kings” protests organized around the country had a collective attendance of at least 5 million that Saturday, the Trump event in DC (ostensibly a tribute to the US Army) might not have gotten 250,000 for the whole area. It was probably best symbolized by the reel of a Sherman tank slowly proceeding down the road, its squeaky treads clearly audible because there was hardly anyone in the stands to watch it. As for Your Own Personal Jesus, Donald Trump spent the whole time with a pinched, pained expression on his face, similar to when he walked out of the closed door meeting with Putin in Helsinki. That is, when he could bother to stay awake.

Happy Birthday, Occupant of the White House. No, I am not going to wish you any more, cause it looks like you wouldn’t enjoy them anyway.

But Trump’s No Good, Very Bad Day happened at the same time (actually June 13) as Israel’s preemptive strikes on the nation of Iran, which in the first stages took out several heads of the Islamic Republic including the head of the “Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps” and several directors of Iran’s nuclear development program.

And before I go on, I have to say I am of two minds about that.

On one hand, the reason the Middle East is the way it is now is really the reason that the United States is the way it is now, and that is because Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu are basically the same guy. Now, to be sure Netanyahu is much smarter than Trump and not quite so obnoxious and repulsive, but they’re in much the same situation: A crooked as hell wheeler-dealer who first made his mark for media savvy (I first remember seeing Netanyahu as a talking head on ABC’s Nightline), who is involved in so much self-dealing, and has used his office for so much self-dealing, that the second he leaves office he is going to be prosecuted and most likely convicted. Which is why he will do everything in his power to never leave office. And the main part of that is catering to the coalition of religious fanatics that currently has controlling interest in his government, and pushing their agenda of ethnic cleansing all the Muslim minorities en route to turning the country into a one-party theocracy. (And if you’re asking if I refer to Trump or Netanyahu, the answer is ‘yes.’)

On the other hand, simply having an evil government does not mean a nation has no right to exist. And the problem with the ostensible “anti-Zionists” is that for some reason they think the Jewish state is the only one whose existence is illegitimate. But if history has shown anything it’s that when Jews are a minority in their nation they risk being disenfranchised and ultimately killed. (Like in the United States, if Trump thought he could get away with it.) There needs to be a Jewish state and there needs to be a two-state solution. Iran flat out wants to destroy Israel. Arab nations historically have always wanted to destroy Israel, but the Sunni nobles want to destroy the Shia Iranian republic more. And it’s not as though Iran’s government are nice guys even by Saudi standards. Indeed, this is a point of similarity between Iran and the United States. One country is technically a democratic republic but is actually run by a cabal of corrupt and ancient theocrats who want to start World War III in hopes that their Messiah will appear in the Middle East. The other is Iran.

So Israel was going to provoke pre-emptive war and get the United States to go along with it, like we always do. After all, it’s not as though anyone can make the case that Iran isn’t a sponsor of terrorism that has repeatedly declared itself committed to destroying the State of Israel. And is developing nuclear energy even though its economy is based on petroleum exports.

But given that Israel had the situation well in hand, it raised the question of why the United States needed to be actively involved. It goes without saying that the president acting unilaterally without Congressional declaration of war is blatantly un-Constitutional, but it also goes without saying that no president of either party has sought a declaration of war since Pearl Harbor, and that would be one of the least unusual things about Trump.

And all this is an example of why I’m not one of those people posting hot takes on the news every single day. (Along with the fact that I have a real job.) Because in just the last few days since last weekend, things have been changing faster than I can keep up.

From June 14 onward Viceroy Trump was making increasing noises indicating he would not only back up Israel diplomatically, but also militarily. His social media posts frequently repeated words to the effect of “IRAN MUST NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON.” It often happens that elderly men can’t get out of their obsessive prejudices, but few of them have their own nuclear weapons. This deathly fear of nuclear war is in fact a sincere position of Trump, which is one of the reasons Vladimir Putin has so easily manipulated him on Ukraine, because he can always threaten nuclear escalation if the US acts against him. Even if Trump has effectively been immunized to the American justice system, one nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day.

So last weekend after his typical “two weeks” dodge, Trump actually sent bombers out from Missouri to hit Iran nuclear sites in what everyone is already calling the Nobody Came To My Birthday Party War. June 21, after world reaction had gotten sufficiently crazy, he came out of the White House to deliver an official announcement on the mission, backed up by JD Vance, Pete Hegseth, and Marco Rubio, who seems to be more sad and embarrassed every time he gets on camera. The speech was notable for its brevity and for being very inarticulate and “low energy.” At some point during all of this, Trump thanked God, probably because he thought he’d just won the Super Bowl.

Ostensibly the reason Netanyahu wanted his little Donnie involved is because the US has “bunker buster” bombs that have multi-stage explosions which are intended to eliminate targets deep underground. Well, as it happens, “Despite the use of heavy munitions, initial assessment suggests the facilities weren’t fully taken out.” News articles indicated that “it appeared nuclear material at Fordow had been moved in advance of the attack.” Probably because the president telegraphed his intentions by screaming that Iran must have an “unconditional surrender” and then wavering on whether he would get involved.

But Monday, after a perfunctory Iranian attack on US bases in Qatar, Trump declared, on his own initiative, that the two nations had come to a ceasefire, yelling on Truf Censhal, “(Israel) is not going to attack Iran. All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly ‘Plane Wave’ to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect! Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

And Monday-Tuesday overnight, the ceasefire ended with Israel accusing Iran of violating it. And Trump posted, “ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!” Less the World’s Policeman and more like the World’s Substitute Teacher.

And once it became clear that our Dominus Mundi could not make a ceasefire happen between two other nations by imperial proclamation, he got clearly upset. On the way to his flight to a NATO meeting in Europe, Trump told reporters “We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing.”

Let’s all get aflutter and act like the biggest news story on Tuesday was that Donald Trump used the F word in front of reporters. Most of this country has been using the F word in private for the last ten years because of this guy. But hey, at least all the basic-cable news outlets got an excuse to play the recording unedited. It’s NEWS!

Which kind of gets to the real reason we have to put up with this and keep putting up with it: Some people want Trump around cause he’s great TV.

In one of his Bulwark columns, Jonathan A. Last went over the related issue of the Western world outside the US dealing with Russia and Ukraine, and said, “this is what nations have to do: Make long-term plans about an uncertain future based on incomplete information and constantly shifting variables. America is no longer capable of such things because the American people do not want leaders who are capable of them.”

The reason we have a tyrant toddler fucking up every aspect of the world every single day is because this country really IS a democracy and this country didn’t want its favorite “reality” TV game show host to go to prison. The fact that he would be president was incidental. The plain folks of the land selected the best representative of their collective soul.

The premise of the Republican Party and Trump in particular (who as far back as his PLAYBOY Interview praised the Chinese Communists for showing ‘strength’ in crushing the Tiananmen protests) is that democracy doesn’t work and we should get rid of it. The fact that he got re-elected in the first place shows that he might actually be right.

At the very least, millions of people who voted for the Democrat candidate in 2020 against Trump did not do so last year, either because of the Biden-Harris policy towards Israel and Gaza, because they thought Kamala Harris had girl cooties, or they just couldn’t bother to care about the future of their country, which they knew was an issue because they were at least smart enough not to actively vote for Trump. But it doesn’t matter. In our binary political system, when you don’t vote, you vote. Because not voting for A usually means B wins. If you don’t want B to win, you have to get out and vote for A. Since you know damn well that in this case Republicans are going to come out Hell or high water to vote for Republicans to keep Democrats from winning.

If we manage to get this country back without our own pre-emptive strikes on a theocratic government, we really need to change this political system to curb the chance of 2024 happening again. For example: Tuesday night, the Democratic Party primary for New York mayor (which is the only party primary that matters) was a ranked-choice vote, and the establishment candidate was the centrist (and corrupt as Hell) Andrew Cuomo, trying to make a political comeback after leaving office in disgrace. Despite having several other choices, New York Democrats rallied around Muslim “progressive” Zohran Mamdani, getting more than 7 percentage points over Cuomo, a result that caused Cuomo to concede even though Mamdani has not yet cleared the 50 percent threshold to avoid a runoff. Given the margin, Mamdani might have won with the traditional first-past-the-post primary, but as of Tuesday 984,859 people voted, whereas in 2017 (before the ranked-choice system was implemented) the Democratic primary that was won by Bill de Blasio got only 437,517 votes, which indicates that more people might turn out to vote if they have someone to vote for, and if their “weird” first choice doesn’t automatically throw away their vote.

That would be the main change we need to make on the federal level. Also, qualification tests for candidates. Like a psychological exam. And a civics exam. And a literacy exam. If that seems too invasive, at least make the guy post 50 times on social media without misspelling his own name.

The Big Beautiful Breakup

You had said that you saw no difference between economic power and political power, between the power of money and the power of guns—no difference between reward and punishment, between purchase and plunder, between pleasure and fear, between life and death. You are learning the difference now.

– Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

The big news in America right now is that Our Lord and Savior Donald Trump decided to declare Los Angeles a war zone after he sent ICE out to an Hispanic neighborhood to barge in and arrest residents without a warrant and they encountered resistance for some reason. I say “decided to declare” because as Keith Olbermann among others has pointed out, when the LA Lakers won their last championship in 2020, the number of arrests for rioting was 76 suspects, whereas over the last weekend the number of arrests (at a Home Depot) was 42. I mean, the LAPD first put out a statement saying most of the protests were peaceful, and recently put out another statement saying “The LAPD has not received any formal notification that the Marines will be arriving in Los Angeles. However, the possible arrival of federal military forces in Los Angeles—absent clear coordination—presents a significant logistical and operational challenge for those of us charged with safeguarding this city. The Los Angeles Police Department, alongside our mutual aid partners, have decades of experience managing large-scale public demonstrations, and we remain confident in our ability to do so professionally and effectively. That said, our top priority is the safety of both the public and the officers on the ground. We are urging open and continuous lines of communication between all agencies to prevent confusion, avoid escalation, and ensure a coordinated, lawful, and orderly response during this critical time.” Basically, ‘hey, we’re the professionals at beating up civilians, and even we think this is overkill.’

[As of Tuesday evening Marines were in fact deployed to Los Angeles.]

But in my mind, this is just another example of Trump doing something big and outrageous in order to scare liberals (and conservatives) so that nobody is thinking about what’s going on behind the scenes. Prior to The Battle for Los Angeles, the big story was the apparent break-up between Our Perfect Lord Donald Trump, who was born from his mother’s side and sent by Dharma to teach the Path of Enlightenment to the nations, and Elon Musk, who is best known for spending multiple billions of dollars to actually make Twitter worse than it already was, in order to spend a mere few hundred million to elect Donald Trump and get a role in his regime (since ‘administration’ is the antonym of what we’ve got even by comparison to 2020).

But how did that break-up happen? Well, several reasons, one being that Elon’s ‘move fast and break things’ ethos didn’t work that well in reorganizing government, not that it worked that well with Twitter, and it really hasn’t been working with Tesla or Space X. Related to that is that Elon and his hired Musketeers in DOGE* became very unpopular even within the Trump regime for their high-handed actions. Related to that is the fact that Elon is, basically, higher than a bald eagle’s nuts most of the time, which was confirmed second-hand due to news exposes fueled by those offended inside staffers, and confirmed externally by just looking at him. And part of that is the specific rumor that Elon poached the wife of Stephen Miller, both professionally and romantically. This may account for the non-rumor black eye that Musk sported in his White House event announcing his alleged retirement from the Trump Team, although he said it was caused by his son, whom I believe he named after a quadratic equation. That kid’s got a mean left. But then, I think of A Boy Named Sue, and when Elon’s son grows up, he’s gonna be able to kick Sue through a wall.

Well, that’s just the behind-the-scenes mess. But then it blew up on social media, which is the only thing either of these two care about. Why? Because Elon objected to Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill.

For one thing, the official title of this thing in the House version is One Big Beautiful Bill. Because apparently the average IQ in the United States is still over two digits, and something MUST be done about that.

The bill in its current form barely passed the House by one vote, partially because two Republicans voted against it which they could afford to do because three Democrats died of old age or sickness during this term of Congress. The current dispute is how much of it the Senate is going to use and how much of that bill will be approved when it comes back to the House for reconciliation. To complicate things further, reconciliation in Washington means that a Senate majority can override an otherwise prohibitive filibuster but only so long as the bill affects mandatory spending, revenue, OR the federal debt limit and can only pass one such bill per year for a maximum of three reconciliation bills, although the subjects are frequently combined, hence Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill.”

Now prior to the Celebrity Divorce, this bill was best known (or not) for all the cuts it is going to make to social-spending programs like Medicare. But the Big Bullshit Bill also has little provisions that were either buried in the dross so as not to be noticed, or added in at the last minute, which caused even some Republicans to object after the fact. Like Section 70302 (that’s how big this thing is) stating that: “No court of the United States may enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), whether issued prior to, on, or subsequent to the date of enactment of this section.” In effect this would mean that judges would need to create a bond amount in order to make injunctions enforceable, and since this is retroactive, any current injunctions against the Trump regime in court cannot be enforced. (Technically this applies to ANY contempt citation, not just against Trump, which is a great example of The Law of Unintended Consequences.)

This is not so well publicized, especially by our ‘liberal’ media, cause let’s face it, Donald Trump won the most votes without the Electoral College, so clearly Americans don’t care about homo commie shit like ‘rule of law’ or ‘the Constitution’ anymore.

But Elon Musk still seems to think of himself as a classical capitalist and thinks it’s a bad thing for government to overspend and waste money. I mean, that was the ostensible reason for DOGE, not to send college kids into every bureaucracy’s database to get all their info so that Peter Thiel and Palantir** could have access to it. But apparently the increase in the deficit not only disturbed some Republicans (in private, of course) it disturbed Musk enough to speak publicly. And it’s a real issue.

Largely at the behest of people like Musk, the Big Bullshit Bill (hereafter referred to as BBB) changes the tax laws (including state and local exemptions from federal tax) so that all but the highest income levels will have a net tax increase, Medicare would be cut by $500 billion over eight years, and Medicaid would be cut by $880 billion over time.

The end result, according to the Congressional Budget Office, is that over the next decade, the federal deficit, which is currently almost 2 trillion dollars, will increase by an additional $2.4 trillion.

You can look at CBO’s pie chart for fiscal year 2024 here. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61181 In that year, defense spending was only $850 billion. It is dwarfed by the combined cost of Social Security ($1.5 trillion), Medicare ($865 billion) and Medicaid ($618 billion).

For those of us who still consider ourselves right-wing (on the standard that right-wing means ‘there are objective realities that cannot be changed by politics or social consensus’, not ‘Trump is my Shepherd; I shall not want’) the big question over all this is: how does a bill that specifically targets entitlement spending end up raising the deficit by a factor of trillions (with an s)?

Because:

military spending is $150 billion above and beyond normal budgetary increases such that for the first time the military budget would be 1 trillion dollars in itself;

spending on ICE alone is increased $9.5 billion in addition to increases in support funding for Border Patrol and Department of Homeland Security;

Republicans are going to renew the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act tax cuts, mainly on the upper percentile, that otherwise would have expired after 2025. (Republicans may fear the wrath of voters but they fear the wrath of the donor class more.)

And in the midst of this, let us not forget that all of this will end up undermining America’s living standards and economic performance, which will undermine our bond market, which will increase the national debt. When the whole premise of conservative anti-tax theory is that economic growth will make tax cuts pay for themselves. (If that was ever true, it was in the glory days of JFK and LBJ when ‘progressive’ taxation was so high that it demonstrated the Laffer Curve.)

So Elon decided to twit about this. First, he declared he could be silent no longer and declared Trump’s budget bill a “disgusting abomination”, a phrase that usually brings to mind Trump himself.

He said that Trump wouldn’t have won without him and he wouldn’t have more than 51 Senators without him. Which is probably true.

And then Musk pulled out the BIG news: The reason Trump hasn’t released the Epstein Files is because Trump is in them. And the country’s collective reaction was: yeah.

Look, Trump is a convicted felon and while technically not a rapist, was found in a civil case to have committed sexual assault. Clearly that wasn’t enough to stop him from getting elected again. Saying that Trump is in the Epstein Files is like saying that your cousin is an alcoholic whose “sister” is really his mom- everyone in the family knows it, you’re just not supposed to talk about it.

And yet that was probably enough to get Trump to pull this stunt in LA. It probably has more to do with Stephen Miller (aka Pee-Wee German) trying to get quotas for arresting “illegals” because there aren’t enough violent criminals to go around. But it’s still part of the Trump technique of flooding the zone with shit and making sure you can’t deal with the last outrage cause there’s always a bigger one around the corner. “Hey, don’t pay attention to that teenager I raped! Lookit all these orphans I killed!”

Who’s going to win the catfight? Who gets custody of JD Vance? Trump, easily. Trump has control of the federal government, and he can and has threatened to cut Musk’s lucrative government contracts. Musk has no equivalent leverage. It’s already looking like Musk is backing off, mainly by deleting a lot of his comments on X, which is apparently supposed to make everyone forget they saw them (or saved them). And this weekend, Musk decided to share a post by Trump against the rioters and the officials in California, apparently finding new solidarity in their shared fear of dark people.

But Musk still has Twitter. Which has undermined most of its reputation and business model under Musk, even before his fusion with Trump, yet it is still used by many influencers, especially the type who care about both Musk and Trump. And those are exactly the sort of people who still care about conspiracy mongering and who were rather annoyed when the FBI heads Kash Patel and Dan Bongino did an about-face and told the press that Jeffrey Epstein did in fact kill himself.

Meanwhile on June 8, Senator Rand Paul (BR.-Kentucky), having some ancestral memory of being “libertarian”, objected to the BBB’s increased funding for ICE. About the same time, Cato Institute think-tank writer David Bier posted that the costs of deportations would by themselves add almost 1 trillion in costs to the BBB.

This week there was a column in The Hill (another outlet that has undermined its reputation in the Trump Era yet still has a following for that reason) saying that the fallout between Trump and his sugar daddy could still have long-term consequences for Republicans as a whole: “Trump was counting on the bill’s passage to be a significant political tailwind that would boost his polling numbers and Republicans’ midterm hopes, particularly given the ongoing chaos over tariffs and trade policy. Now, whichever version of the bill eventually passes, Republicans look like the party of chaos.”

All of which is leading up to the June 14 parade in Washington, ostensibly as a celebration of the US Army anniversary (though they never asked for it), but really as a birthday parade for Donald Trump, because a military parade is the gift you give to the man who has everything, including the most powerful country on earth. Is it right that we turn our military, and our country as a whole, into a monument for one man’s shriveled manhood and even more decrepit brain? Well, we could have had a president who was your stereotype career social democrat who would have run everything business as usual but at least wouldn’t have run every aspect of this country into the ground.

But no, you had to prove you were so much smarter than people who read books and stuff. Well, at least we don’t have a president who’s a doddering old man who can’t keep track of one sentence to the next, who doesn’t know what direction he’s facing and who can’t even climb the stairs.

* – pronounced like the Venetian ‘doj’ by the press, though I always preferred it like ‘dough-GI’. Shoutout to Jonathan Capehart at MSDNC, who has pronounced it ‘dodgy.’ And then of course there’s ‘douche’.

– ** ‘Palantir’ of course comes from the lore of J.R.R. Tolkien, referring to a crystal-ball communications and surveillance device developed in the First Age. According to Wikipedia: “A major theme of palantír usage is that while the stones show real objects or events, those using the stones had to “possess great strength of will and of mind” to direct the stone’s gaze to its full capability. The stones were an unreliable guide to action, since what was not shown could be more important than what was selectively presented. A risk lay in the fact that users with sufficient power could choose what to show and what to conceal to other stones: in The Lord of the Rings, a palantír has fallen into the Enemy’s hands, making the usefulness of all other existing stones questionable.”