The Ukraine War and Hearts Of Iron IV

If you are a history buff, then what we are seeing in Ukraine is not exactly news to you. Indeed, it may be depressing how much history does repeat itself. And yet, looking at history does mean that you can look at the past and see the parallels to today and decide not to make the same mistakes. It also means that those who do choose to repeat the same mistakes are doing it because they are under the same delusions as their forbears.

And if you play computer games on Steam, you’ve probably at least heard of the Hearts of Iron series, and the last few times I’ve played that game I’ve noticed that the loading screens feature a lot of historical quotes that have at least ironic value, and some of them seem to be that much more ironic in the wake of the first large-scale war in Europe since 1945.

Gaiety is the outstanding feature of the Soviet Union.

-Joseph Stalin

This is an example of how “truth” works in a totalitarian universe where everybody HAS to believe the government line (on pain of death) and so politicians don’t even need to lie well. It’s of a piece with the Winter War against Finland, where Finns invented the phrase “Molotov cocktail” but also invented the phrase “Molotov’s breadbaskets” because Foreign Minister Molotov insisted that Soviet bombing runs on Finnish cities were really just dropping food parcels for Finland’s starving masses.

Alternately, it could be that this phrase is just an example of Stalin’s famously dark sense of humor. But as Stalin was (inaccurately) quoted as saying, “Dark humor is like food. Not everybody gets it.”

Certainly not the Ukrainians.

The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them.

-Sir Arthur “Bomber” Harris

Harris was a leader of the British Royal Air Force Bomber Command in World War II, and like America’s General Sherman, he had a single-minded focus on destroying the enemy’s home ground as the most quick, efficient, and therefore humane, means of ending a war that was thrust upon his country.

In World War II, this led to the outright destruction of cities like Dresden from conventional bombs.

It’s been slightly less than two months, and already there are reports that Ukraine has been able to target supply depots in Russian territory with air attacks. Recently Vladimir Putin’s government acknowledged that the economic sanctions from the West would have an effect on his economy, contradicting previous government remarks. Which is funny, given that shortly after the invasion started, Putin’s main protege (or perhaps ingenue) told his own fan club that the invasion was a genius move because Putin got access to all that territory for maybe $2 in sanctions. But that’s understandable, given that said protege launched his own half-assed attack on a national capital over a year ago and hasn’t even paid two dollars for it yet.

Yes, despite all the carnage in places like Yemen and Palestine and all the violence previously committed by Putin, the attack on Ukraine was what finally got the world’s attention. Even then, if Putin had succeeded in taking Kyiv in the first week and sweeping through the east, the international community probably would have had to take it as a fait accompli like his other aggressions. But then, the feat has not been accomplished. Because Ukraine fights back, it exacts a price for aggression, and that makes it a lot easier for the rest of the world to do likewise.

It brings to mind a much more famous quote by wartime prime minister Winston Churchill: “Never, never, never believe any war will be smooth and easy, or that anyone who embarks on the strange voyage can measure the tides and hurricanes he will encounter. The statesman who yields to war fever must realise that once the signal is given, he is no longer the master of policy but the slave of unforeseeable and uncontrollable events.”

That’s the part of the speech most people know. The part that isn’t quoted as often is: “Antiquated War Offices, weak, incompetent, or arrogant Commanders, untrustworthy allies, hostile neutrals, malignant Fortune, ugly surprises, awful miscalculations — all take their seats at the Council Board on the morrow of a declaration of war. Always remember, however sure you are that you could easily win, that there would not be a war if the other man did not think he also had a chance.”

People don’t matter, only what they represent.

I would rather live in a swamp of Greater Romania than a paradise of small Romania.

-Ion Antonescu

Ion Antonescu was a general in the Kingdom of Romania leading up to World War II, at a time when the political spectrum there ranged between pro-German and people who thought the Nazis weren’t anti-Semitic enough. Antonescu’s faction ended up winning control of the government by 1940 and Romania ended up joining the Axis invasion of the Soviet Union next year. Part of this was to take back territory that the previous government had conceded to Stalin, even though Romania had also surrendered Transylvania to Hitler’s other ally Hungary. The rearranged borders were defined by Antonescu as “Greater Romania.” Of course the Axis lost that war and Romania ended up losing that eastern territory again.

Antonescu’s quotes above reflect the philosophy of collectivists, whether they be left-wing socialists or right-wing fascists. They don’t see people as individuals. They don’t think that individual lives matter, or even the collective impact of government decisions. All that matters is the collective – the State, or the race. Any deprivation the individual people suffer is irrelevant to the goals of the state (or rather, the people who currently own it).

Which is why, contrary to some analysts, I don’t think that Putin is going to acknowledge a timeline. They say he only has a few months worth of supplies and financial reserves to wage a war, but that assumes he actually cares about the discomfort of the civilian population, or even his elite allies. So of course he’s going to let the government default on its debt, of course he’s going to create a national draft, of course he’s going to institute rationing and of course he’s going to come up with even more restrictions on public activity that would make all his “freedom-loving” fellow travelers in the US howl and scream if they were enacted by a Democrat. I mean what else could he do, back off and admit he made a mistake? See, that’s the beautiful thing about fascism. Fascism means never having to say you’re sorry.


Germany will either be a world power or it will not be at all.

-Adolf Hitler

In review of Putin’s career, there are a lot of quotes that indicate certain ideas are consistent in his mind even if he has not always been so reckless in pursuing them. The press has brought up where he said that the death of the Soviet Union was “the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century.” More recently in December 2021, Putin did an interview and said that the event was ” the disintegration of historical Russia under the name of the Soviet Union”.

Further back, Putin made a speech to the Munich Security Conference in 2007 lamenting the “unipolar” state of the world, namely a world in which America and the West were dictating terms without Russian influence. A few months after his Munich speech, Putin spoke at a meeting with members of the Valdai International Discussion Club. In that speech, he elaborated: “I know that, unfortunately, in some Eastern European countries, not just the candidate for the post of defense minister but even candidates for less important posts are discussed with the U.S. ambassador. Is this a good thing? I do not think it is very good for all the countries concerned because sooner or later it will provoke the same rejection that Soviet domination once provoked in these countries. Do you understand? It might seem welcome today, but tomorrow it could lead to problems. Even old Europe is obliged to take NATO’s political interests into account in its policies. You know how the decision-making process works. There is probably no need to explain. Sovereignty is therefore something very precious today, something exclusive, you could even say. Russia cannot exist without defending its sovereignty. Russia will either be independent and sovereign or will most likely not exist at all.”

Similar to the quote about Greater Romania, the status of the nation is more important to the fascist than its living conditions. In the case of World War II, it’s worth noting that the main nations of the Axis Powers – Germany, Italy and Japan – were all latecomers to empire after the great powers of Britain and France had already taken the best colonies in the undeveloped world. Germany had lost World War I while Italy and Japan were on the winning side but both thought they didn’t get enough spoils from the war, and both (like later Nazi Germany) wanted to re-assert themselves via imperial expansion at the same time that Britain, France and the United States were seeing colonial empires as not only contradictory to their humanist ideals but more hassle than they were worth. The Axis nations’ struggles against not only the West but neighboring nations endangered their economies and in the long term lowered daily living standards. And that of course was before full scale war in 1939, which ended up with the Axis being bombed into the Stone Age and occupied. And yet Germany and Japan in particular recovered from that occupation and became economic powers with an arguably better standard of living than America or Britain.

Germany ended up losing its colonial empire and Great Power status, just as Britain and France did, and had to suffer a lot more for it on the way because it decided to force itself on the rest of the world rather than adapt to it. Now, maybe Russia isn’t going to be fucked in the way that they (literally) fucked Germany after World War II, but like them they might find out that in the long run, plain old market liberalism is better than empire after all. But in the immortal words of Wesley Snipes, “Some motherfuckers just gotta ice skate uphill.”

GIRAFFES ARE HEARTLESS CREATURES

Well, yes.

REVIEW: The Batman

I believe it was in the early ’70s when DC Comics, mainly under writer Denny O’Neil, decided to make a clean break from the four-color, Adam West-style Batman to something closer to the character’s 1930’s vigilante roots. One step in this was to have Dick Grayson graduate high school and go to college so Batman would be operating alone again. But another quiet step was that they started calling him “The Batman” again.

And yet other media still presented Batman as a standard superhero until the Tim Burton Batman movie, way back in 1989. I had problems with the movie, but at the time I thought they were at least trying to present the character realistically, for instance by giving him armor. But the Batman movies since that one have been getting steadily more grim and dark, especially with the Zack Snyder movies that took their cues from Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns.

My sister wanted to go see the new Robert Pattinson Batman movie (directed by Matt Reeves) and we went to see it last Wednesday, and I think she was a lot more impressed by it than I was. I think it IS very good, but at the end of the day The Batman is just another movie about a heavy-breathing, obsessed vigilante in a leather mask.

No, not The Batman, The Riddler.

Some general impressions:

I don’t like how most of these movies since Michael Keaton have basically made Batman a bulletproof tank who gets into fights with gunfire and survives mainly because he is a bulletproof tank. Because given the other similarities between the characters, going too far in that direction makes Batman basically Goth Iron Man.

But given that this Batman does have military-grade armor and uses contact lenses with digital feeds to record events around him, you’d think that they’d make him more like the comic character and have the eyes be white slits in a helmet, which you could also explain as nightvision lenses. I mention this because the movies insist on making the actor’s eyes visible and having the masked vigilante wearing black eye makeup around the eye holes of the black mask, so when Pattinson takes it off, he looks that much more emo than he usually does. Although this is probably the only modern Batman movie I’ve seen that acknowledges that he is wearing makeup.

On the other hand, I did like how this is one Batman movie where Batman avoids guns and killing. It is also a movie that actually focuses on Batman as a detective, having to follow The Riddler’s clues and piece together the big picture, although at least one person pointed out that it’s Selina Kyle (Zoe Kravitz) who actually grabs the crucial suspect while trying to get revenge for her slain roommate.

Paul Dano, exerting some serious “Voted Most Likely To Shoot Up The High School” energy as The Riddler, allows himself to be captured fairly late in the movie, and it seems like the whole thing is over, but The Batman realizes that there’s at least one more step in his scheme, and it’s especially disturbing given how it uses “stochastic terrorism” to organize people over social media to commit mass violence against a city. In the process of that discovery, Batman learns that fear and vengeance are not enough. This is part of why the movie is almost three hours (and 20 minutes of that is end credits), but it’s that final act that distinguishes this movie from something where Batman just uses the Batmobile machine guns to blast bunches of criminals.

Robert Pattinson is actually very good as Bruce Wayne and credible as The Batman, and I don’t know why that would surprise anybody given that Pattinson made his reputation playing a grim, brooding obsessive who stays out of the sunlight. But then both he and Kristen Stewart have gotten a bad rap for being the popular stars of the teen-fantasy romance of the Twilight Saga, which I didn’t love as much as its fanbase seems to but did not hate nearly as much as some people seem to.

The Batman is a very well-done movie, but it is too long, too dark (in both the literal and figurative senses) and doesn’t really give us anything new or beyond what came before. The Riddler, as perverse and insane as he is, is not more insane than Heath Ledger’s Joker. Pattinson, good as he is, doesn’t have the total Batman package of Christian Bale, much less the edge of Keaton, the suaveness of Val Kilmer, or the metal nipples of George Clooney.

But as I keep saying, not like it matters. Superheroes are literally corporate property, as in, not only can DC (no longer calling itself a comics company) do whatever it wants with these characters, all that aggregate product means that any given character is the product of more than one creator. Batman isn’t just the Bob Kane-Bill Finger character, and hasn’t been for decades. DC has actually been running multiple media versions of its characters concurrently (as with Grant Gussin and Ezra Miller both being The Flash), and in that regard, this movie is just Matt Reeves’ interpretation of Batman, no more or less official than the Ben Affleck one, although given the success of this movie it’s probably going to be the setting they’re going to run with.

Overall, I thought that The Batman wasn’t as good as I was hoping, but a damn sight better than some haters want people to believe.

REVIEW: Spider-Man: No Way Home

Spider-Man, nobody knows who you are…

Even before seeing the movie, I thought the title Spider-Man: No Way Home was a bit ominous and negative compared to Homecoming and Far From Home. Now I know why.

No Way Home has all the great elements I’ve come to expect from Marvel Studios movies, but it’s also kind of a bummer. And to explain my opinion, I basically have to go over the entire movie. There’s not much point in giving a spoiler warning, because not only has everyone seen this before me, half of the major plot elements have already been given away in previews.

At the the very end of Far From Home Mysterio, in a last act of spite, blames Spider-Man (Tom Holland) for his death and announces his Secret ID as Peter Parker. This taped statement is broadcast to the world by none other than J. Jonah Jameson (once again played by J.K. Simmons). Peter, his friends, Aunt May and Happy Hogan all get investigated by the government, but the charges are dropped thanks to “a very good lawyer.” But this doesn’t repair Peter’s reputation, and he’s caught in a very Spider-Man like situation: “I am the most famous person in the world, yet I’m still broke.” This all comes to a head when Peter, MJ and Ned all apply to MIT in their senior year and are turned down due to “the recent controversy.” So in his awkward adolescent fashion, Peter decides to look up his old friend Doctor Strange to solve all his problems with magic. And Strange, in his own adolescent fashion, actually agrees.

Strange no longer has the Time Stone, so he can’t just go back and prevent the original event, but Wong (who is now the Sorcerer Supreme cause Strange was ‘blipped’ for five years) recalls that there is a spell of mass forgetfulness. So Peter asks Strange to cast the spell, but when he’s reminded that this would mean that everyone forgets who he is, Peter attaches so many exceptions to the spell, Strange loses his concentration and the spell turns into this giant dimensional anomaly that will eventually destroy reality. As happens in these situations.

This ends up summoning the various super-villains who fought Spidey in the other Sony movies, and these are fairly easily defeated, but when they compare notes, Strange, Spider-Man and the bad guys all deduce that the villains had been plucked from their time lines just before Spider-Man ended up killing them. So Peter doesn’t want to send them back before curing the psychotic disorders that made these guys villains (which in most cases also would remove their powers). Strange doesn’t care. So Spidey actually defeats Strange and resolves to fix the problem without killing anybody. This involves science instead of magic, which is probably why Strange didn’t think of it. Peter makes real progress, but Norman Osborn’s evil side re-asserts itself and screws the whole thing, with catastrophic results. At which point MJ and Ned discover that the other two Spider-Men (Mans?), Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire, are also in New York, so they get them together to help Peter. And this part of the film is a real blast, with the three Spider-Men trading stories and working together in the lab. And eventually they lure the villains out and manage to subdue them again in a big brawl, but during this, Osborn/Green Goblin shows up again and sabotages the containment spell Dr. Strange was using to stop Earth’s dimension from imploding. When Strange tells Peter that he can no longer stop all the various parallel dimensions from merging with Earth, Peter tells him to redo the original spell, under its original parameters, which means that everyone, including MJ, Ned and Doctor Strange himself forget who Peter is. And even though there’s no real reason Peter can’t just come back to MJ, explain what happened, and try to rebuild the relationship, he sees that she and Ned have actually gotten into MIT… so he basically figures they’re better off without him.

Like I said, a real bummer. And I haven’t even spoiled the real bummer.

One of my Facebook friends posted (before I’d seen the movie): “I did really enjoy Spiderman: No Way Home. I highly recommend it. However, there is a takeaway to the story that needs consideration. ‘The most heroic thing you can do is cut yourself off from friends, family, and all social contacts. Give up love. You will only hurt those you love. Give up rage. Rage will only make you a monster. Give up pursuing personal joy, comfort, or basic needs. Give up anything outside of a single minded focus on your mission. The mission is everything.’ That is a classic view of masculinity. And it is toxic as hell.”

I don’t know if this story was a specific example of toxic masculinity, but I see the point. The thing is, this film kind of flies in the face of what came before, where half the fun of these movies was in Tom Holland’s interactions with the supporting cast, and the generally light-hearted tone. Not unlike CW’s The Flash TV series, the central character in No Way Home works better as a member of a team with a network of friends, and the conclusion took all that away from him. Theoretically, they could address all this in the next movie, but Marvel doesn’t usually do more than three movies focusing on one character (and Sony’s track record with Spidey hasn’t been the greatest).


But in regard to that last point, No Way Home is good at least in that it creates a sort of redemption for the last two Spider-Man actors, who in the movies might have been obliged to kill their enemies but still did kill them. Not only is the fan-service premise perfectly executed, but the acting is at the least very good, especially from Willem Dafoe, who at this point is so creepy and reptilian that he can play the Green Goblin without a mask.

The other aspect of this movie is how it ties into the whole chain of MCU movies – as I’ve mentioned, some of these movies tend to fit into the sequence better than others. In this case, the fact that Doctor Strange was actually willing to go along with Peter’s crazy idea just illustrates that the personality problems that caused him to lose his medical career didn’t go away just because he achieved ridiculous levels of magical power. In fact, this leads directly into the next movie, because the second after-credits scene of No Way Home isn’t even a “scene” but a straight-up preview of Doctor Strange and the Multiverse of Madness, simply without the title logos. Which raises the question: How does Strange deal with the consequences of breaking into the multiverse when he doesn’t even remember WHY he did it?

Christmas Music That… I Dunno.

Happy Festivus!

Since there again isn’t a whole lot of Christmas music I actually like, the stuff I’m searching out this year is kinda scraping the bottom of the barrel. The bad stuff is just way too common, and so I found myself discovering stuff that isn’t actually good, but is in one way or another… memorable.

Billy Idol, “Yellin’ At the Xmas Tree”

An aging-gracefully Billy Idol gives us a pretty rockin’ tune paired with a deeply weird Poser-style computer animated video about the family patriarch coming come from the pub drunk as fuck. Extra points for the line “Santa’s balls are jinglin’.”

Bob Dylan, “Must Be Santa”

What’s even more incomprehensible than a Bob Dylan song? Bob Dylan taking a traditional Christmas song and doing it completely straight. Any resemblance between this one and “Schnitzelbank” is probably not coincidental.

Wild Man Fischer, “I’m A Christmas Tree”

If you’ve never heard of Wild Man Fischer… you’re probably better off.

Bob Peters, “You Ain’t Gettin’ Sh*t For Christmas”


Which is what I usually tell people.

Christopher Lee, “Jingle Hell”

As I present this example of Christopher Lee’s power-metal Christmas “singing”, it gives me the opportunity to recount my favorite Christopher Lee anecdote:

Among the many bits that got cut for time in Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings adaptation was the anticlimactic Return to the Shire, in which the heroes return to Frodo’s home town to find it’s been taken over by corrupt Hobbits led by Grima Wormtongue and Saruman. At this point in the story, Saruman has lost most of his powers, so he is easily overthrown but the heroes let him live. And as he walks out of town he verbally berates Wormtongue and expects him to follow along like a whipped dog. Instead Wormtongue finally snaps and stabs Saruman in the back.

Apparently Jackson wanted Lee as Saruman to loudly cry out during this scene, and Lee told him that a man stabbed in the back wouldn’t cry out so. And Jackson asked why, and Lee said, when he assassinated Germans for British Intelligence during World War II, “it’s not ‘AAAAA’, it’s ‘hhhh…’- because the breath’s being driven out of your body…”

The Stooges, “I Wanna Be Your Dog”

Look, it’s got sleigh bells in it, right?

REVIEW: The Wheel Of Time

One of Amazon TV’s latest original productions is a long-awaited adaptation of Robert Jordan’s epic High Fantasy series, The Wheel Of Time. It is in some ways between the more famous fantasy epics, not as bloody and cynical as George RR Martin’s A Song Of Ice And Fire, but a little more political and complex than JRR Tolkien’s Middle-Earth cycle. It’s like Dune in that there is an all-female order of mystics trying to guide the destiny of human affairs, but there is a specific reason for the gender bias in magic. In a previous age, the Aes Sedai order was co-ed and led by a man named Lews Therin, called the Dragon. But when he and his allies confronted “the Dark One” and stopped him from conquering the world, the Dark One laid a final curse, corrupting the male side of the One Power that channelers use to perform magic. This taint corrupts male channelers in proportion to their power, and since Therin was the most powerful channeler of his age, he ended up going insane and killing his own family, and ended up doing far worse before finally dying. Since then the Aes Sedai has been an all-female group and one of their responsibilities in addition to finding female channelers to recruit is to isolate any male channeler and “gentle” him by cutting his access to the One Power. If this seems like a euphemism for gelding a stallion, that’s probably intentional.


The fact that this world’s Pandora/Eve equivalent is male instead of female creates an unusual influence for women in a fantasy setting; I sometimes think of The Wheel Of Time as the anti-Gor. It certainly has more pivotal female characters than Tolkien. In fact the series’ main Gandalf figure is Moiraine, a wandering Aes Sedai (played by Rosamund Pike, the closest thing to a name actor in this production), who at the start of the story enters a small village called Two Rivers because she has determined that the Dragon Reborn is one of five young townspeople: The hunter Rand al’Thor, his best friends, blacksmith Perrin Aybara and neer-do-well Mat Cauthon, along with Nynaeve the village wise woman and Egwene, her new apprentice, who happens to be Rand’s girlfriend.

There have already been a lot of changes made in the Amazon production compared to Jordan’s source material. For instance there’s a shocking character death in the first episode that wasn’t in the books. The main divergence as far as the plot goes is that in the books, Moiraine was originally seeking only the three male protagonists, but in the show, both Egwene and Nynaeve are potentially the Dragon Reborn. I had thought this didn’t make sense given that they wouldn’t be any more dangerous to the Aes Sedai than other female channelers, but someone on the Internet pointed out how this change resolves a plot problem with Jordan’s first novel: Moiraine has to take Rand, Mat and Perrin to her superiors but has no reason to bring Egwene, who basically tags along out of sheer stubbornness even though she still has a family in Two Rivers. The TV series takes the element of choice away: After the Dark One’s monsters attack Two Rivers, it’s clear that they’re hunting for the Dragon Reborn, and if the five youths don’t leave with Moiraine, their family and friends will be endangered again. Not only does this explain why Egwene would leave her parents, it also explains why Mat would leave his family, given that he seems to care about his little sisters more than their parents do.

Another change is that in the novels it was made clear no later than Book 3 that Rand al’Thor was the Dragon Reborn, but at this point in the TV series (four episodes in as of Thanksgiving) Rand has only performed one arguably superhuman feat, whereas Episode 4 ended with Nynaeve performing an epic channeling that saved the day.

My impression of the TV series is that it’s pretty decent but not spectacular, which is right because my impression of Jordan’s book series was that it was pretty decent but not spectacular. I, like a lot of folks, quit reading before it got to Book 10. (I liked one Internet comment that went ‘I plan to watch until Season 6 and then stop.’) I personally think of Robert Jordan as being akin to George Lucas: possessed of a great ability to create likeable heroes and a vast, enchanting background setting for them to adventure in, combined with an even greater inability to give those characters believable plots and dialogue. And so far, even George RR Martin doesn’t have Jordan’s problem with wrapping things up; Jordan died of heart disease in 2007, and the book series was only completed with notes given to his designated successor, fantasy author Brandon Sanderson (who is listed as a producer on the show along with Rosamund Pike).

Thus so far The Wheel Of Time does a pretty good job of conveying the setting, although like Amazon’s adaptation of The Boys comic, it reserves the right to change things around and keep the audience guessing. And while some purists are objecting to the changes already made to Jordan’s narrative, I’m sure there are at least as many who think that any change could only be an improvement.

Schrodinger’s Don

It was recently announced that Norm McDonald died after fighting cancer for years, which no one knew about cause he didn’t want to tell anybody. But don’t worry folks, I’m sure that’s just his idea of a joke.

Okay, that wasn’t very funny. Here’s a better joke. My best friend is dead.

It’s been about two months since September 14th. That’s when I found out. I am still trying to process it.

Don Garner has been a friend of mine since… I can’t even remember. More than 30 years. I was still hanging around UNLV and met him through one of the Dungeons & Dragons groups, along with at least one other close friend and a few other guys that I’ve run into a few times since then. And even more than most of those guys, I had a lot in common with him. He knew that much more about Star Trek, and about naval history, than I did, though I think a lot of that was precisely because he’d researched the military history of every US Navy ship named “Enterprise.” He had a great sense of humor. I’ve posted some of his stuff on Facebook. Like: “In the news this week… Richard Branson beat Jeff Bezos into outer space by nine days… and Richard Branson does NOT have over 56,000 people’s names on a petition to not allow him to return to Earth the way Jeff Bezos does”.

But Don had been in a decline for years. And years. Such that when I learned for sure that he had died, it was sort of like how my roommate’s cat passed away. He took him to the vet and they found out the little guy had lung cancer, and they told my roommate that the cat maybe had weeks to live and it turned out to be only a few days. So it was sad, but we knew it was going to happen at some point, we just didn’t know when. The difference being you expect your pet to be completely dependent on other human beings, and you don’t think there’s anything else you can do if the pet goes terminal. When you’ve got somebody who’s otherwise able to take care of himself and who doesn’t do so, it’s that much more perplexing.

When I said recently on a completely different subject, that I had told someone “you can’t expect other people to care about your life more than you do”, that was Don I was referring to.

For example, Don was the guy who invented the sixburger. That is, you go to Wendy’s, you order two Triple cheeseburgers, and you put them on one bun. I mean, I weigh over 300 pounds, and I couldn’t compete with this. The thing is, for whatever reason he didn’t even have the same work ethic I did. I don’t see why anybody actually wants to work, but this was different. Like, years later when he was on SSI, he frequently seemed surprised that I couldn’t put him into my schedule cause I had a job. It was like, Don was intellectually aware that other people had to work for a living, but that wasn’t really part of his reality. It would have gotten in the way of his hobbies.

And as he aged, his metabolism slowed and he was less able to absorb the results of eating like Dagwood Bumstead. And if you, like me and Don, are on the Standard American Diet (or what Penn Jillette calls ‘SAD’) it’s that much more likely that you’re going to end up with heart disease or Type 2 diabetes and then you’re that much more likely to need consistent long-term medical coverage. And in this country, if you don’t get that coverage through your employer, you need to rely on the generosity of the state – or lack thereof.

If I can think of a point of real divergence, it was around 2006 or so. Prior to that Don had been going from job to job and eventually wound up living with me and my Mom, and we eventually had to kick him out cause he was unemployed and we needed a roommate who could support the household. Don ended up moving in with Jason, a gamer friend of ours down in Henderson. In the summer Jason referred us to jobs with the call center where he worked. It sucked, frankly, but I stuck with it, because it paid for medical insurance and I could see where I was going downhill and how Mom was going downhill with old age. This is how I got to see a regular doctor and how I got diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes. That sucks, and I can’t tell you I have been good with my diet, but I have been eating less sugar than I did before then, and smaller portions. I have also been given prescriptions that have kept my blood sugar under control.

Don meanwhile quit the call center job after only a few weeks cause he couldn’t handle the work. He stayed at Jason’s and gamed with us, but spent a lot of his time asleep. He wasn’t looking for work, or looking into the issues with his health. And when I talked to him about Jason’s place, he would always grumble and complain about his living circumstances (living not only with Jason but his mom and other relatives), but would always move to whatever room they put him up in, as long as they gave him a place to stay, and food to eat, and they didn’t ask questions and they didn’t make him get up and look for a job. His illness was getting to the point where he had band-aids on his toes all the time, and one of his legs looked like a rabid wolf had ripped it up then pissed on it. And because Jason was at that point living with his sister and her two young children, she started to object. His other sister was a social worker who had tried to get Don to get some kind of public assistance and help with his issues, but he had refused. Eventually they forced the situation, and by that time, my roommate had moved out, and then my older brother, so I was once again asked to move Don in. I told him at that time, “Don, the only reason that I am taking you in now is because this is your LAST CHANCE to not die on the street homeless.”

In fact now that I recall, it was my mother of sainted memory who really saved Don’s life, or least gave him more years than he would have had. A couple days after he came back in the house, it was about 2 am or so and Mom had gotten up and noticed Don on the couch and saw that he was unresponsive. She eventually got him up, but from her own experience with Type 2 diabetes realized he was going into a coma. She immediately got me up (even though I had to work in the morning) and take him over to Sunrise Hospital to be checked in. I dropped him off for the ER overnight and they decided his condition was bad enough that they were going to take him in with no questions even though he had no insurance. That’s when Don was first diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes. But that was the good news. It was good news in that at least we knew what was going on. But then he had to proceed from there.

After being at Sunrise about 5 days, he got a veritable grocery list of prescriptions and other scripts he had to take to the UMC (University Medical Center) hospital, because that was the only place where he could get those prescriptions filled with no insurance and only state support. So one day I took him over at 11 in the morning, thinking it would be a couple of hours. They told him that in order to fill the prescriptions from Sunrise, he would have to go through the whole admissions process again at UMC. So I dropped him off. He was there til about 9 pm.
This involved going through several hours of admissions procedures at the ER, going into the Pharmacy line several times- where they had only ONE teller processing orders for a line that (not coincidentally) averaged over 20 people deep, finding out that the doctor at Sunrise who made the prescriptions was not listed in the UMC roster of doctors authorized to prescribe, and in any case they had to change at least one of the prescriptions because they didn’t actually have the brand of pain medication the doctor wrote. While waiting, my friend also went through blood sugar crash at least once BECAUSE he was waiting for the prescription to regulate it, and in direct contrast to the Sunrise staff, no one really bothered to do anything for him at the time.

Compare this to my barely-adequate insurance from work where at most of my jobs I’ve been able to schedule an appointment with a doctor, get regular checkups, the doctor will fill out a prescription with a pharmacy I specify and I can go to the drive-thru and pick it up less than an hour after the fact.

But we eventually managed to get that prescription regimen, and Mom and I both told Don that one of the conditions of him staying with us was that he had to do SOMEthing to support himself. And in a couple weeks we got him to go to the welfare office down the street and got him on food stamps/EBT. And that’s ALL he did. Even after Mom died from her own various co-morbidities he did not do anything to support the household other than get the EBT, which was often not enough to cover his usual diet (which hadn’t changed all that much). So I had him living in the house, I was still paying rent to my sister who has been managing the house ever since, but I was the only person making money and Mom’s Social Security was gone. (If I made enough money to live by myself, I wouldn’t have been in my Mom’s house.) I knew by now that Don was really not able to hold down a job even if he’d wanted to (which he didn’t), but he should have at least been able to call someone to arrange social services and expanded coverage. He did not do that. There was no way I could babysit him or get him to do what he needed to do if I had to work full time during the day. Meanwhile I still had to cover bills by myself on ten dollars an hour even as he jacked the air conditioning up and pushed the power bill past $200 a month because his circulation had made him intolerant to heat. After a few months of this, I told him, flat-out, ‘I don’t care if you get a job, get on welfare, or suck cocks on Boulder Highway, you are GOING to do something to pay your way here.’ He did not. He didn’t want to admit that he needed to be on government dole, but at the same time he had absolutely no problem with couch-surfing at my place, or Jason’s or anyone else and expecting us to cover his upkeep on our budget while he did the absolute bare minimum to maintain his own life. So again, a few months after the ultimatum I had him move out.

And at that point, he really was homeless. He’d been at Catholic shelters for a few weeks and that basically convinced him that he needed to actually get some professional assistance and support. He was in this flophouse downtown at Ogden for a little while but eventually after getting SSI the state moved him to the apartment in Henderson where he stayed for the rest of his life. Once he’d gotten that much stability, we were able to resume social activities again, see movies and play role-playing games with our friends again. And it mattered a lot to me that we just managed to get together, tell jokes and have fun, even if it was just the two of us and a couple other guys. He wasn’t in the same game group with Jason, even though Jason and his sisters did ask if he wanted to come back. I guess in retrospect Don didn’t want them to see what happened to him. Among other things, he lost both legs over the years, mostly due to diabetes but partly because the people tending to his various infections were no more attentive than the people at UMC.

My current job obliges me to work graveyard (just about dusk to dawn) and September 12, I got a call from our mutual gamer friend Hugh just before I was about to get ready for work. He normally helped Don with rides to games (since he lives on the other side of town) but his truck broke down and he hadn’t heard from Don in about a week and he feared the worst. Unfortunately I had to work Sunday and Monday and I had no time to get out to Don’s place, which is over 13 miles away. Not only that, on my next day off (Tuesday the 14th) I had two doctors’ appointments set up back to back starting before noon when I only left work Tuesday at 4 am. So I was already on the other side of town from where I live, that much further away from Don’s, and had barely gotten any sleep.

At this point I had every expectation that Don was dead, but I didn’t know. I also knew from experience that he could sleep for over 24 hours and not respond to the phone or even to a knock at the door. So as I drove across town, needing to move yet getting caught behind every construction cone, red light and dumbass driver in Vegas, Don’s status was unknown. He could have been dead. He could have been alive. Schrodinger’s Don.

I was on the road stuck between lights and I was scanning rock radio. It started with AC/DC’s “Highway to Hell.” I thought not. I turned to another album rock station and got Alice in Chains:

I believe

Them bones are me

Some say

We’re born into the grave

I feel so alone

Gonna end up a big ol’ pile of them bones

I got to the apartment complex after 3 pm or so, went upstairs and the first thing I noticed was all the empty paper bags left out from Amazon’s delivery service. So clearly Don hadn’t left the apartment, or he would’ve taken them to the garbage. I hit the door several times, and called on the phone, and when I got no answer either way, I warned him I was calling 911. So I did. The Henderson Police came out 20 minutes or so later and interviewed me for what little I knew, then they had me go to the ground floor to talk with one of the cops while another one got the superintendent from the office. Then they opened the door, and as I was talking about the situation with the cop and Don’s downstairs neighbor, we smelled it. All the way from upstairs.

You know that weird combination of stale locker and festering wound? That’s the first time I’d ever smelled that.

The neighbor told us that he’d smelled something odd in the pipes in his bathroom for a few days, which supported my suspicion that Don was dead even before Hugh called me.

My friend Hugh is one of those Trump guys who considers Don’s treatment to be an example of state “death panels” deciding who gets to live or not, and I kind of agree that this is what happens if you rely too much on the government, or on anybody. But that just raises two points: One, the alternative to Nevada’s indigent health care system would be to sink more money into the state government to establish reliable care for everyone, including the indigent. But that would be socialism. The only other option is to go back to the previous American standard which is that everybody only gets health care depending on the plan given by their employer, and Don was already psychologically unable to hold down a job even before he was physically too sick to hold a job.

Two, if there is no collective system of care, that just brings the issue back to individual responsibility. If there is no socialized system, that means you are solely responsible for your own upkeep, and that means holding down a job to get medical benefits whether you like working or not. Because again, no one is going to care about your own life more than you do. Even if they’re paid to care.

Don was not of subnormal intellect. He knew what day it was, at least when he wasn’t zonked out on painkillers. He, like me, and many of our gaming friends, started off as politically right-of-center, and like me but unlike most of those friends came to realize that voting Republican these days is like sticking your dick in a drum of radioactive waste. I’m saying, he wasn’t an idiot. On some levels, he was one of the smarter people I knew. But even more than those guys who want to court Trump Virus to own the libs, it felt to me that there was some broken gear in his system that I didn’t know how to fix.

A few days after the event, my sister suggested I post on Don’s Facebook page to find his next of kin, and his cousin in town managed to reach his sister and brother who both live out of state. The next week I had a long talk over the phone with his sister, who confirmed that all of the issues that my friends and I had noticed with Don’s behavior were no news to her.

This Monday, November 8, would have been Don’s birthday, which is just a week off from mine. And every time that holiday season rolled around I was always wondering if Don would survive for another Thanksgiving or Christmas, and I was always kind of impressed that he did. And that won’t be the case anymore.

There will be no real funeral. There will be no formal obituary. It took over a month for Don’s sister to get a cause of death from the Henderson office. After all this, I have taken it upon myself to summarize another person’s life, and as before I ask myself what more I can do, and again reach the conclusion that no matter how much it is, it will never be enough.

Don had a lot to offer. And like a lot of people I’ve known, he deserved a lot more out of life than he got.

If I can’t do anything else, I can at least speak here. So, Goodbye, Don Garner. You were my best friend for over half of my life. Your life mattered. To me and to those of us who saw the best of you.

You are still remembered.

You are still loved.

REVIEW: Dune

One of the big movie premieres in October was the new adaptation of Dune, the far-future sci-fi epic novel by Frank Herbert, directed by Denis Villeneuve, probably best known in the States for Arrival and Blade Runner 2049. There is not much point in discussing the movie without spoilers. After all, the story actually pre-dates Star Wars, and while it is not nearly so well publicized, it has been publicized well enough to where people have heard terms like “gom jabbar” and “wormsign.” It has been said by critics that Villeneuve immerses the viewer immediately and doesn’t really bother telling the audience much about the background, but I thought the exposition in the movie did a perfectly good job of setting things up for the audience. If one still needs it, here’s a brief primer:

The various electronics and media that were revolutionary in Herbert’s day and ubiquitous today are in this history banned under a “Butlerian Jihad” that occurred after a revolt of artificial intelligences. As a result much of the technical work of civilization is done by “mentats” who use mental disciplines and a few drugs to attain the heightened memorization and thinking abilities to allow them to serve in the role of computers.

The main drug used in the civilization is melange, or “the spice”, which is psychoactive, physically addictive and absolutely necessary to the galactic society, because the altered states it produces are what allow navigators to “fold space” and achieve interstellar travel, which would otherwise require computers. However the spice is only produced on one planet, Arrakis (or Dune), which is so hot and dry that a human body would desiccate simply from exposure to the atmosphere. To survive, colonists and local humans (the Fremen) invented stillsuits, which are full-body jumpsuits that contain the body’s moisture and recycle all its excretions – yes, including shit – into water to rehydrate the user.

Psionic powers are real, and most mystics focus on clairvoyance or “prescience.” The main mystic order is an all-female group called the Bene Gesserit, who are embarked on a subtle breeding program with male nobility to create a male offspring called the Kwisatz Haderach – the one whose prescience will allow him to “bridge space and time.”

Despite the advanced features of this society, it is basically a combination of corporatism and feudalism where noble families under an Imperial dynasty rule the galaxy in order to preserve the trade routes and the flow of spice to the planets. As the story starts, Arrakis is ruled by the House Harkonnen, the most corrupt, dysfunctional and perverted family to hold a position of authority prior to the Trump Organization. But the Emperor has recently handed their fief over to the House Atreides, which centers on the foresighted Duke Leto (Oscar Isaac), his Bene Gesserit consort Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson), and their only son, Paul (Timothee Chalamet). Paul is developing prescient abilities from a young age, which are periodically tested by the Bene Gesserit on suspicion that he is their prophesied leader. As the family moves to Dune, Paul is also haunted by visions of a young girl who turns out to be a Fremen named Chani (Zendaya). Chani and Paul seem to have a psychic bond, or perhaps Paul is seeking out Chani because she is the only being in the galaxy who is more ethereally pretty than he is. Meanwhile, it is unclear exactly why the Atreides were granted control of the planet, and Leto (rightly) suspects a courtly trap.

The Dune franchise expanded considerably from the original novel, but Dune itself, with its extremely long and involved storyline, has long been considered an unfilmable property. This is best demonstrated by the fact that the most famous adaptation before now was directed by David Lynch, who has produced more unfilmable narratives than any other director in America, yet everyone (including Lynch) thinks he got it wrong. So everyone was asking how Denis Villeneuve was going to fit it all in to one movie. The obvious choice he made was: not to. The other more successful adaptation prior to now was a SciFi Channel production from 2000, which was done as a miniseries. This film ends at about the point in the original story when things start to get interesting. The sequel (which is now planned) is supposed to be the second part of the novel after Paul begins to live among the Fremen and plans a confrontation with the Emperor. So while the movie is marketed as Dune, the title credit clearly shows it as “Dune – Part One”.

As it is, Villeneuve’s Dune basically impresses on sheer scale. Like, everyone remembers the first scene of the original Star Wars where Leia’s ship is pursued by an Imperial Star Destroyer that sweeps over the movie screen. Well, the people in Dune use ships that make a Star Destroyer look like a Winnebago. It’s a pretty good action movie, when it gets to that point. It has good to great acting, with Josh Brolin and Jason Momoa being their usual badass selves as Gurney Halleck and Duncan Idaho respectively, and Chalamet giving an intense performance as the “little boy” who is starting to realize his true potential, even as it terrifies him. This movie doesn’t capture the exotic, decadent weirdness of the setting like Lynch’s movie, but then the only director who could beat Lynch for exotic decadent weirdness actually decided he couldn’t film Dune. Villeneuve takes the project seriously, and that sense of scale goes from the sweeping visuals to the often overwhelming sound effects. Meaning, that while Dune is streaming on HBO Max, this is a movie that must be seen in a theater.

Just don’t buy anything else while you’re there. I mean really, they can drop a matinee ticket down to five bucks, but they charge $5.99 for a bottled water or small soda?

Capitalist Pigs… In… SPACE!!!

So the latest uproar being generated on social media is the left-wing attempt to cancel the capitalist space race in which Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Virgin’s Richard Branson and Elon Musk seem to be in some kind of competition to get themselves in orbit with various private space programs. The Left’s opposition to this is almost as superficial and useless as the billionaires’ own publicity efforts, though to be sure, bitching about them on Twitter costs a lot less. And that is kind of the point. Robert Reich on Twitter: “With just their increased wealth during the pandemic, America’s billionaires could pay for 10 years of the Child Tax Credit that goes into effect today for one year, cutting child poverty by half. And they’d still be as wealthy as they were before the pandemic. “

Ha Ha Ha. Right.

The budget bill for fiscal year 2021 – passed under a Republican president, mind you – was 4.829 trillion dollars. Now never mind the deficit this causes, because deficits clearly don’t matter to either ruling faction. A trillion is a million million. As in, one trillion of a quantity is one followed by twelve zeroes. A billion is a thousand million. As in, one billion is one followed by nine zeroes. A trillion is a thousand billion. As Nathan Lane might say, “do the math.”

The level of money that government, specifically the US federal government, operates with is an actual exponent of what most billionaires get to work with. Even the richest guy on earth, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, is worth $214 billion, at least according to USA Today. Forbes puts it at “only” $193.5 billion. Let’s say we round to $200 billion. Jeff Bezos, who has more money than God (and probably more than the Catholic Church) would need to multiply his wealth almost by 25 to get as much as Washington already has.

So if we’re not feeding the hungry and housing the homeless and solving climate change and all the other stuff, it’s because of the government we have now, because that government could be doing all those things right now cause it already has more money than Jeff Bezos will ever have, and if for some reason it actually needs more it can just rocket the deficit farther past the stratosphere than Richard Branson will ever get. And that would be the case whether we had a 90 percent tax rate on the upper class or not.

I had mentioned a while ago that there was one event in my life that had as much to do with me becoming a right-libertarian as anything Ayn Rand ever wrote. Believe it or not, it was Live Aid. To briefly recap: I like a lot of young adults at that time contributed to the Live Aid fundraising campaign to get food and support to the starving in Ethiopia, because Bob Geldof and the other organizers of the Live Aid campaign did make a convincing case that enough people working together could solve the world’s problems. But then after the money was raised and the food was delivered to the Horn of Africa, Geldof and his people found that a lot of it was left to rot on the docks while some of it was actually confiscated by the Ethiopian government to use as leverage against its own people.

The lesson I got is that even when there is collective action from private actors, and even when that is backed up by some governments, the government on the ground can burn all that altruism and effort to dust. Because if government has far more scale to do good than any one philanthropist, it has far more scale to do evil than any individual criminal.

In the case I mentioned, the people getting in the way of feeding the world were the Communists running Ethiopia, but in the modern day the obstacle is a faction that is even more vicious, collectivist and devoted to Russian ideology: The Republican Party.

This is especially obvious in regard to their state voter suppression efforts, but I have already touched on those to some extent. With regard to the subject at hand, it was indeed a liberal (Jack Kennedy) initiative that got America first to the moon. It was the government, under NASA, that first had to get us to space. According to Wikipedia, NASA’s share of the total federal budget peaked at around 4.41 percent during the Apollo project, but by 1975 (after we’d reached the moon more than once) it declined to 1 percent and actually decreased from there. “Despite this, public perception of NASA’s budget differs significantly: a 1997 poll indicated that most Americans believed that 20% of the federal budget went to NASA.” In a March 2012 hearing of the United States Senate Science Committee, science communicator Neil deGrasse Tyson testified that “Right now, NASA’s annual budget is half a penny on your tax dollar. For twice that—a penny on a dollar—we can transform the country from a sullen, dispirited nation, weary of economic struggle, to one where it has reclaimed its 20th century birthright to dream of tomorrow.”

But for practical purposes, our government doesn’t really have a space program.

Oh, but it has Space Force. Yes. Cheeto Jesus himself, our small-government, tax cutting, regulation cutting Greatest President Capitalism Ever Had decided to add a bureaucracy to our already bloated government for reasons I still cannot explain. It’s not like Trump seems to grasp Gene Roddenberry’s message of peace, reason and infinite diversity, much less George Lucas’ moral that maybe turning a flawed Republic into a blatantly evil Empire isn’t such a good move in the long run. But in any event, we now have a Space Force, even though in five years no one has told me what the fuck it does.

What, are we handing out parking tickets to Martians? Are we busting the illegal smuggling trade in Green Orion Slave Women? What is this?

Now given that there is a real national security interest in protecting our satellite network and responding to any Russian or Chinese attempts to weaponize space, you would think this alleged branch of our military would have some kind of military shuttle program. A monitoring system. But have they explained what we’re actually spending the money on? As far as I can tell the US Space Force’s only official expenditure is for the field uniforms that are done in standard BDU/desert camo, y’know, cause apparently that’s the color pattern you need to camouflage yourself IN FUCKING SPACE.

If you wonder why these nose-in-the-air billionaires are investing their wherewithal in space exploration, well, it’s because we used to have a government that did that for the country, and we don’t any more. So why not them?

Now, there is one aspect to this leftist complaining that is completely legitimate. To such extent as NASA actually exists, it seems to exist to outsource its former charter to these guys for their space side projects. NASA provided $2.9 billion to Musk’s Space X to build a moon lander. New Mexico, “one of the poorest states in the US”, paid $220 million to build “Spaceport America” for Branson.

However, I don’t see government spending taxpayer money for billionaires who could pay their own way as a big endorsement for more government spending. It does however help explain why things are the way they are. Libertarians have been pointing out for years that the problem with our government being as big as it is is that its power and money makes it a more attractive target for business to manipulate. But the other side of the matter is that government would rather hand out money to billionaires and corporations than homeless and powerless people because the corporations and rich guys can actually do something for them. In the Business Insider article, they focus on the small town of Truth or Consequences (which, ironically, took its name to attract publicity from the audience of a then-famous game show that has long ago left the air) which has yet to see much trickle-down from Virgin’s use of the area, even as the town’s mayor assumes that the town will get more business once Virgin’s commercial space travel service becomes fully operational.

Personally, I would think that a real laissez-faire policy wouldn’t punish businesses and rich people just for being rich, but neither should it give them unearned rewards when they already have natural advantages and the resources to develop their companies without government help.

It’s not that there aren’t infrastructure and other projects that need a government to execute, and it’s not as though those shouldn’t be under a public authority as opposed to an individual, otherwise Elon Musk could just buy I-95, call it private property and then charge a subscription fee to drive on it. But on the other hand, if he did that, there might actually be road maintenance.

If you want to avoid that state of affairs and actually have an activist government, you need to get involved and be an active watchdog on that government. Billionaires or no billionaires (which is what most socialists want), you’re not going to have that activist government unless you consider that the Democratic Party is failing to apply even the technical majority in the Senate that they currently have, and maybe you should start investigating exactly why that is.

Not like any of these billionaires need me to defend them, and not like they’re really going to be hurting if we rolled back most of the Trump-Ryan tax laws. But if you really think we can solve all our problems by soaking the rich, first you’re going to have to convince me that government at all levels is not lazier and piggier than any zillionaire in this week’s Two Minutes Hate. And when the government includes people like Matt Gaetz and Louie Gohmert, that’s gonna be pretty hard.

Tough Shit, Readers!

Well, for those who don’t like me talking about politics or role-playing games, here’s a subject that touches on both.

The role-playing hobby had several antecedents, but most people credit its start with the Medieval Fantasy game Dungeons & Dragons in the mid-70s. “D&D” was published out of Lake Geneva, Wisconsin by Tactical Studies Rules, which (like MTV or KFC) eventually just became its initials, TSR. It ended up producing several other examples of geek culture like the 70’s apocalypse game Gamma World and the Space Opera game Star Frontiers. They even managed to license D&D as a Saturday morning cartoon, which like most Saturday morning cartoons of the time can only be appreciated ironically.

At the head of this game empire was designer Ernest Gary Gygax. E. Gary Gygax. EGG. Saying that Gygax created D&D is a bit like saying Stan Lee created Marvel Comics (and let’s not get into that right now). He certainly did promote himself like Lee. Like Lee, he was fond of a greatly expanded intellectual vocabulary and a salesman’s approach to his business. If there is an image of the typical role-player as a know-it-all, do-it-my-way male who might be a bit sexist and involved with macho Conan-type Fantasy, Gygax was a pretty big reason for that. He was very good at promoting the idea that Dungeons & Dragons – or his “Advanced” trademark of it – was the epitome of the hobby his company had created and if you were using some other system, you were doing it wrong. But to people like me who had our heads expanded with the very concept of role-playing in the 70s and early 80s, Gygax really was the standard for how to think and how to approach the game. A lot of us thought so. And then we grew up.

We started asking questions like, “why does armor make you harder to hit when it should make you easier to hit but harder to hurt?”, “Is it Good alignment to kill Goblin children, even if they are Goblins?” and “Why does my 1st-level Magic-User have less hit points than his housecat familiar?” Other people started making games with different rules, and in other genres that D&D didn’t simulate well. (For example, TSR’s licensed Marvel Super Heroes, where you actually lost hero points by killing people.)

At the same time, in the process of expanding TSR’s business profile (such as the cartoon deal), Gygax moved to Los Angeles and sort of “went Hollywood.” According to Wikipedia, “Hearing rumors that the Blumes (his charter financial partners) were trying to sell TSR, Gygax returned from Hollywood and discovered the company was in bad financial shape despite healthy sales. Gygax, who at that time owned only about 30% of the stock, requested that the board of directors remove the Blumes as a way of restoring financial health to the company. The Blumes were forced to leave the company after being accused of misusing corporate funds and accumulating large debts in the pursuit of acquisitions such as latchhook rug kits that were thought to be too broadly targeted. Within a year of the departure of the Blumes, the company was forced to post a net loss of US$1.5 million, resulting in layoffs of approximately 75% of the staff.” However Brian Blume and his brother sold their stock to businesswoman Lorraine Williams who eventually took over TSR and nudged Gygax into selling his stock and leaving the company.

All that financial maneuvering didn’t change the fact that the company had diversified into areas that weren’t panning out, and they were no longer the only game in town for RPGs. In 1996 they were put in a cash crunch when publisher Random House returned large numbers of unsold books and demanded fees, and despite having high sales, TSR again laid off staff and by 1997 Williams decided to sell the company to competitor Wizards of the Coast, most famous for the card game Magic: The Gathering. And while Wizards kept the brand going until about 1999, they released a third edition of Dungeons & Dragons under the WotC brand, as every edition has been since. And they’ve had ups and downs but have solved some of the problems with old AD&D. (Like, 1st-level characters have more hit points than a housecat.) Notably the fifth edition of D&D stated that in creating character background, “You don’t have to be confined to binary notions of sex and gender.” Despite having at least one example non-binary character in the old source material, this declaration was not popular with some people.

Jayson Elliott registered a new TSR in 2011, since the previous trademark had expired, and under this brand published Gygax Magazine with the cooperation of Gary’s sons, Ernie and Luke, but not that of Gygax’s second wife and widow Gail (and that’s its own big kettle of fish) so that project discontinued along with the involvement of the Gygax brothers, although Elliott continued to hold the trademark and publish Top Secret: New World Order, a contemporary edition of an old TSR espionage game. But then this year Ernie and a couple of business partners relaunched TSR as their own thing apparently over Elliott; as he told it on Twitter, “last year, we missed a filing date, and another company registered it, though we are still using it in commerce. While we could win a lawsuit, we frankly don’t have the money to litigate. So we’re licensing it back from them.” The social media accounts of TSR confirmed that they were charging a nominal fee of about 10 dollars for Elliott’s company to use the name. Although that has just changed.

Basically if you are not already familiar with the flaming shitshow, and I can’t blame you if you aren’t, the new company, TSR3 or as a lot of us call it, “nuTSR” started off by saying they were going to be producing a new Star Frontiers despite not having a timetable for that and the minor detail that Wizards still has the rights to that trademark. Then Ernie Gygax did a tape interview where he said “There’s a ton of artists and game designers and people that played TSR, and recently they were dissed for being old-fashioned, possibly anti-modern trends, and enforcing or even having the concepts of gender identity”. (I am not sure why the concept of gender fluidity is so radical when Gary Gygax himself created a Dungeon Master’s Guide item called “Girdle of Masculinity/Femininity”, but here we are.) The company is (in its spare time, I guess) trying to promote a game by TSR veteran Jim Ward called Giantlands which looks like a Gamma World-type project, but the details are sketchy on that too. Family drama got pulled in when Luke Gygax supported TSR’s critics and the TSR Twitter account basically dissed him by saying he was never part of the company and Luke said that was a good thing. Whoever is running that account (apparently someone other than Ernie Gygax) announced that they were going to deny right to the TSR name to any old-TSR Facebook fan page that didn’t take their side. In this, at least, they resemble the classic TSR, whose competitors liked to joke that the initials stood for “They Sue Regularly.” (In the midst of all this, Jayson Elliott announced before the 4th of July weekend that he was changing his TSR Games to Solarian Games, apparently because the brand association is no longer an asset.)

And at one point one of the Twitter trans activists asked the company to publicly state “we here at TSR think that trans women are women, trans men are men and trans lives matter.” And the Twitter account for Giantlands just responded: “Disgusting.”

I mean, I guess I understand why these guys are so defensive. They’re trying to dig themselves out of a hole they created and the only way they can is to do what the Left wants them to do. You’re basically asked to make a ritual statement of your good intentions. So: Do I believe trans men are men and trans women are women?
Well… I’m reminded of that Tim Burton movie where Ed Wood and his crew had to get baptized by a local church to get funding for a film and Wood’s agent is played by Bill Murray and when the preacher asks him “Do you reject Satan and all his evils?” Bill goes, “Sure.”

Frankly all this “critical race theory” and “gender identity” stuff doesn’t matter much to me, but I AM a cishet white guy, and you can’t expect it to matter much to me. I CAN see why it matters to other people. I CAN see why diversity and visibility are important.
I understand that the way I grew up viewing the world has already passed by and other people are taking the stage. And my only advice to the Left in that regard is that one day the same thing will happen to you, and sooner than you think. I mean, maybe you assume that you have a social enlightenment that has eluded your forbears, but I’ve been around long enough to see how my siblings’ generation thought they were going to create The Age of Aquarius and then they grew up, and they had to support families, so they had to get jobs, and then they started asking questions like “Who is this guy FICA, and why is he getting 18 percent of my paycheck?”

Just as most of those people who seem so reactionary now probably thought of themselves as hippies or freethinkers about the time D&D first started. And here’s the thing, I’m one of those guys. Ten years ago, maybe even six years ago, I would have been more aligned with the Trumpniks than the vegan trans people who think the Democratic Party isn’t socialist enough. So why am I not a Trumpnik?

Well, ultimately my greatest loyalty has to be to the truth. That requires preserving a government that preserves the freedom to find the truth. You know, like America, ostensibly. And in the 1980s, the best way to do that was to be a right-winger. I don’t care if the Russians love their children too, it doesn’t matter what they want as long as they have no say in their own government and the thugs in charge just care about their own power. That’s still the case, by the way. It’s just that since the thugs changed their military uniforms for business suits and Marxism for the Orthodox Church, the Party of Reagan has decided they’re okay now. More than okay, they see them as role models.

Whatever I might think about the Left, they’re not nearly as much of a threat to the American way of life as what passes for the Right, especially given the Democrats’ lack of ability to consolidate the government as well as Republicans do even when they’re not in charge. But given their general unpopularity, reinforced by the incompetence they display when they are in charge, one of the few things the Right has going for it is general dislike for the Left.

So in terms of the subject at hand, there may be a lot of people in the gaming hobby who don’t like how “woke” Wizards of the Coast and other companies are getting, or “wish we could just ditch politics and get back to games.” Well look, nothing says you can’t. Nothing says you have to buy Wizards’ D&D or quit playing AD&D Second Edition, one of my gaming groups still uses it. I doubt the people who protest the visibility of people of color (as in, green) or nonbinary characters in the game would be using such characters themselves or have dealt with too many ethnic or sexual minorities in real life. This is the kind of thing that sorts itself: Those who are comfortable with a large variety of people seek each other out; those who aren’t, don’t.

But the kind of people who actually get exercised about that sort of thing – to the extent that they’re willing to use it as a selling point – are generally not politically neutral but trying to signal people who aren’t just politically incorrect but who are unsavory or even criminal.

For example:

Somebody following the nuTSR account noted that that Twitter account is following a “Vargr i’ ve’um” or “Thulean Perspective” whose first profile lists him as “Dissident, gentile, game-designer” and whose second profile claims he is “Officially labeled ‘a disturber of the peace’ by NPCs.”

(Just to bring the meta-commentary full circle, ‘NPC’ is a game term for non-player character, as in, any character or monster run by the game master in an RPG or the engine of a video game, and used as a pejorative by the alternative-to-being-right who think that anybody who disagrees with them is basically getting all their opinions programmed into them by Teh Librul Media. Just as they attack empty-headed media celebrities while worshipping a fake billionaire whose profile was largely a result of the mainstream media pushing him as a celebrity.)

“Thulean Perspective” (sorry, I haven’t bothered to put in all the little Scandinavian accent marks) is a social media profile for Varg Vikernes, who has produced “MYFAROG”, or Mythic Fantasy Role-playing Game, which for some reason he thinks sounds cooler in abbreviation. He was much more famous as a pioneer of Scandinavian Black Metal music, endorsing anti-Christianity and Norse paganism, laced with Nazi-adjacent views including what he calls “racialism.” He became most notorious after endorsing the burning of historic churches in Norway and finally killing “Euronymous”, a former Black Metal colleague. Vikernes was tried and given a 21-year sentence (the maximum possible in Norwegian law) and served 15 years.

Say what you will, he walks the walk.

So if you’re that disgusted with the cosmopolitan leftist agenda, there is certainly a means of rebellion, but how far do you want to go with it?

Certainly both sides have escalated the culture war in this country, but it wasn’t Hillary Clinton’s people who tried to hang the Vice President in 2016 cause the Electoral College didn’t go their way. If the Right wants to know why the Left is so oversensitive and so willing to assume that everyone they don’t like is a fascist, well, it’s because so many of them want to give that impression, saying that they aren’t bigoted while at the same time using Republican state legislatures to pass laws against trans people and some minority voting blocs, while also saying the January 6 Beer Belly Putsch was just a bunch of Trump-loving tourists engaging in free speech and certainly nothing warranting an investigation. It’s the sort of disingenuousness that the Left calls “gaslighting” and I call “don’t piss on my head and tell me it’s raining.”

My take:
Why is D&D under the Wizards label instead of Wizards using the TSR label or Hasbro (WotC’s owner) using the Hasbro label?
Cause Wizards of the Coast, due to Magic and their previous RPG efforts, still had a positive reputation in the industry. A reputation that TSR had by that point squandered.
Whereas Hasbro has a mixed reputation but is mainly associated with family board games.
WotC could have kept the TSR brand to sell D&D along with their Magic product under Wizards, and when Hasbro bought them out, they could have put everything under the Hasbro label. There are reasons why they didn’t. The reputation of D&D is what Wizards and Hasbro are trying to preserve, and it is now associated with them. The reputation of TSR as a business is in hindsight mostly negative.

“nuTSR” isn’t bringing back the E. Gary Gygax tradition of intellectual depth in gaming, it’s bringing back the Gygaxian tradition of presumption and bad business decisions, and only in the latter does it exceed the old master.

The politics aren’t so much the issue, or wouldn’t be if EVERYthing wasn’t a political football these days.
The salient issues are:
A TSR that existed in conjunction with a more established TSR whose holder accidentally let the rights to the IP lapse
Said second TSR basically paying the first (TS:NWO) company a token sum so that they didn’t challenge their IP, cause as the guy said, he didn’t have enough money to sue even if he wanted to
Second TSR trying to promote itself as an old-school successor to classic TSR when they don’t have that company’s most famous property
Not having the other properties (like Star Frontiers) under complete development – or confirmed copyright
Trying to launch a Kickstarter for their Gamma World-type game under dubious circumstances including all of the above

All that, given that everything is a political football, combined with the dubious political tastes of E. Gygax and his business partner just make the thing more skeezy.

And in the meantime this company basically leans into its political incorrectness and victimhood in order to get a customer base without actually delivering anything concrete, which as the alternative-to-being-right goes, is pretty much on brand.

The main lesson I take from all this – other than, Twitter is too aptly named – is that you don’t ever give up your intellectual property, no matter how little money it’s making. Cause some things cost a lot more in the long run.

REVIEW: Loki

In some respects, the return of Tom Hiddleston to the Marvel Cinematic Universe character of Loki was more anticipated than the last two Disney+ Marvel series, WandaVision and The Falcon and the Winter Soldier. Except this is and isn’t Loki from the movies. As a recurring foil in the Thor movies, Loki actually experienced a certain amount of character growth, if only because he realized Thor was starting to see through his schemes, so by the end of Thor:Ragnarok he was there to support him in finding a new home for the Asgardians. But then their ship got attacked by Thanos and Loki ended up dying trying to protect Thor. Then in Endgame the heroes had their “time heist” which required the Avengers to go back to just after they’d defeated the Chitauri invasion and captured Loki, but in a moment of confusion, that Loki escaped. So Loki has effectively been “reset” to just after where he was character-wise at the end of Avengers.

Specifically, Loki stole a Tesseract, which I guess is not THE Tesseract the Avengers needed to build their own Infinity Gauntlet, and wound up in Mongolia, where he was immediately arrested by the “Time Variance Authority” and drafted to help hunt other rogue variables under the supervision of Agent Mobius, played by Owen Wilson, which brings to mind the question of what a Marvel movie would look like if it was directed by Wes Anderson.

Loki does have something like that droll sense of humor, but to judge from only the first episode, it’s just setting up the basic premise. Apparently some triad of cosmic beings set up “the sacred timeline” in order to prevent the sort of chaos that happens with a multiverse (for examples of such, try to map the continuity of Star Trek and Doctor Who. Or lack thereof). However Loki‘s main writer, Michael Waldron, is also writing Doctor Strange and the Multiverse of Madness, so that title already tells you where things are going. In fact based on the rumors about the crossovers in the next Spider-Man movie, it seems as though this narrative and the end-credits scene of the last WandaVision are moving towards a storyline that will string together the various Marvel projects in Phase 4 the way the Infinity Gauntlet arc did with the prior movies, not to mention using the “multiverse” to justify Marvel finally getting to use all those intellectual properties that they sold to other movie studios and that Disney bought back.

Loki the “variant” plays into this once Agent Mobius puts him face to face with his own evil and causes him to realize that his own desire for control over others stems from a lack of control over life. In his attempts to escape, he ends up playing the reel of his life in the “sacred timeline”, and, realizing he can’t go back and that the TVA basically collects Infinity Stones in their desks, sees that there is no point in continuing as he was. This works mainly because Mr. Shakespearean Actor Hiddleston sells it so well, but also because Owen Wilson is a serious grounding influence, or as serious as Owen Wilson ever gets.

This relationship is clearly going to be the core of the series, and that alone is worth the price of admission, although with Loki, even more than the first two Marvel Disney Plus series, it’s hard to tell how it will play out from just the first episode.

REVIEW: Army of the Dead

I have already gone over how much I don’t like Zack Snyder. More than once. Well, actually 300 was pretty good as a straight translation of Frank Miller’s militarist cartoon, and Watchmen was about as good as you can get making that series as a feature-length movie instead of the 12-part HBO series it should have been. But when Snyder moved his ultraviolence to the realm of actual four color superheroes, especially Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, it was clear that he didn’t get the point of those characters and the limitations of his tropes became that much more obvious. I have been told his remake of George A. Romero’s zombie classic Dawn Of The Dead was actually pretty good (if you like that sort of thing, which I don’t). So there was a certain amount of buzz when Snyder announced his next project was the straight-to-Netflix Army of the Dead.

What I don’t like about some movies is how they rely on what Siskel and Ebert called “the idiot plot” – as in, the plot can only proceed if the characters are idiots. In this case an Army convoy carrying a payload from “you know where” gets derailed by a pair of newlyweds on the road when they perform a maneuver you would know not to try if you’d ever seen The World According to Garp. As a result the “payload”, a zombie who seems as buff and invulnerable as the Hulk gets out, kills the soldiers and infects at least two of them, becoming the ‘patient zero’ who zombifies most of Vegas. At this point, you have another patented Snyder slo-mo montage for the opening credits, and the soundtrack is Richard Cheese singing ‘Viva Las Vegas’ as topless zombie showgirls eat a tourist in his hotel room. So already it’s going pretty good.

The movie stars Dave Bautista (Guardians of the Galaxy), and he’s actually pretty good as a burned-out veteran who lost his wife in the zombie plague then helped another housewife find her daughter in the chaos of Las Vegas only to see both of them get taken down by zombies just as the government literally dropped a barrier around the city (another essential plot point that makes absolutely no sense if you think about it at all). Now his daughter is a volunteer at the refugee camp the government set up outside the barrier, and those people are all supposed to be sent to Barstow before the military nukes the city and gets it over with. But before that, a billionaire casino owner hires Bautista to break into his casino and pull out its cash reserves from the safe, promising 50 million dollars to him and his crew. Naturally it turns out to be not that simple.

I don’t take Zombie Apocalypse shit very seriously, and it’s clear that Snyder doesn’t either, but there are some real moments of pathos within the black humor, such as the old man who finally hits the jackpot at the slot machine just as the zombies are flooding the casino. But overall, I’d say this is the best Zack Snyder movie I’ve seen, in that the ultraviolence actually works with the genre (if you ever wanted to see what a severed head looks like when it hits the ground from a great height, here ya go). And Snyder actually manages to cut down on the muddy shots and slow-motion action. Most of the time. And it comes down to the fact that Army of the Dead is actually fun, and that is not a word I normally associate with zombie movies, and even less with Zack Snyder movies.

It’s also a really good movie about Las Vegas insofar as it teaches the most important lesson about going to Vegas: The trick is not to make the money. The trick is to get out of town with it.

Back To Abnormal

The Sunday before last, I got a rough experience in “the new normal.”

I work evening shift (covering after-hours) for a call center, starting at 5:30 pm. I got in my car at 4:15 pm thinking I could get some fast food from a drive-thru, and then swing back home in time to finish my food before my work-at-home shift started. I forgot that “fast food” is one of those obsolete terms like “theatrical release” or “free and fair elections.”

The McDonald’s nearest my house had at least ten cars rolled around the building and that line didn’t look to be moving any time soon. At 4:30 I flipped around to the Jack In The Box where there was only one car at the drive-thru but had to wait several minutes overhearing the customer and the intercom cashier having some conversation that sounded even more stoned than usual for a Jack In The Box customer and/or employee. So when the girl finally pulled forward I wanted to order just two things and the cashier said, “I’m sorry, but the order ahead of you is literally 250 dollars, and the kitchen is going to be occupied. Can you wait 20 minutes?”

“No.”

(Actually, I wanted to say ‘Fuck You gently with a chainsaw’, but that would have taken too much time.)

If I have to spend more time at a drive-thru waiting for food than I would in a sit-down restaurant, doesn’t that defeat the whole concept of DRIVE-THRU FAST FOOD?!?

By this time it was just about 5, the Mexican drive-thru joint in the neighborhood is closed Sundays, so is the sushi joint, and the only other thing I could think of was this place on East Desert Inn that used to be a Del Taco and is now a fried chicken-soul food joint called Golden Bird Chicken. I was reluctant to do so because they had at best ‘eh’ food and their service was as slow as an arthritic tree on the handful of occasions I had tried them. I went inside because (this is another omen) they didn’t even HAVE drive-thru service the first couple times I went there, that’s how fucking slow they were, they put a garbage can in the drive-thru lane because they knew they couldn’t work that fast. I had to wait behind one guy in line and I ordered two barbeque chicken sandwiches cause I figure all they would need to do is take some chop-parts, sauce them and put them on a bun. There was only the one manager on duty, I didn’t see anybody at the grill for several minutes and it was about 5:15 when I asked if they were getting to my order and the manager asked his one employee on staff if they had the makings for BBQ chicken sandwiches and the guy said “no.” Gee, it would have been nice to know that BEFORE taking my debit card. So I waited a little longer for a transaction cancellation but the manager apparently couldn’t coordinate between the previous customer and the one guy who braved the drive-thru long enough to him to cancel the Goddamn transaction for the food I was NOT getting, and he was making me late for work.

So I said, “Congratulations, I just paid you 8 dollars for nothing” and walked out. I barely had time to get to work and I ended up having to order something delivered from a pizza joint, which of course had to be eaten on the side cause I was at work.

By the way, to anybody who lives in Las Vegas: FUCK Golden Bird Chicken. I am NOT going back there, and if you’re thinking about trying them, DON’T.

But if you look at social media, you might have seen a few other complaints about this issue, but most of them are from the managers of chain restaurants themselves. Several people now have to live on the government’s Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC), a feature of the CARES Act signed by President Biden, where they get $300 a month. Several Republican Senators are asking Biden to reduce or end the benefits even as some states are reviewing their own unemployment benefits.

Apparently in the Chamber of Commerce’s own analysis, “the $300 benefit results in approximately one in four recipients taking home more in unemployment than they earned working.” Divide 300 by 40 hours a week. That’s 7.5 dollars an hour. Gross pay. Just slightly more than the Federal minimum wage, which hasn’t increased since 2009.

If business in this country can’t compete with THAT level of pay, then maybe this Trump economy wasn’t as gangbusters as we all thought.

As I’ve said: All minimum wage means is that if it were legal for the company to pay you less than that, then they would. And that’s because your job, relative to the cost of hiring your replacement, is only worth that much to the company or less. If it was worth more, they would pay more.

As flawed and hypocritical as the Left can be, they have hit on a key hypocrisy of the Right: They don’t want a laissez-faire economy any more than the Left does.

Yeah, maybe a lot of these fast-food places are actually run by franchisees, and maybe the manager at Golden Bird Chicken is running with the money in his till and that’s it, but a lot of the joints that plead poverty are still associated with major chains, and their collective resources are being used to put themselves at priority ahead of the smaller operators. Like, if you wonder why the food at your favorite bar got so expensive all of a sudden, it’s because the shift to delivery and crash in sit-down eating thanks to Trump Virus (TM) meant that the chains with more buying power than the local bar needed more chicken and other meat and were able to snap up the food supply.

Much like how Walmart used its collective resources to drink every local store’s milkshake and make them uncompetitive and now everyone wonders why Walmart is the only store in town and no one can afford to shop anywhere besides Walmart.

What certain business owners are really complaining about is that The Law of Supply and Demand is real, and now it’s finally starting to work both ways. The Left doesn’t like that aspect of capitalism (or capitalism in general) because the worker usually gets the wrong end of the deal, but certain economic principles are called “laws” because they apply and have been proven to exist regardless of culture and place. It used to be that workers had to put up with shit conditions and wages because there were always more workers than jobs, but apparently that’s no longer the case. So of course wages are going up. Not as much as some people would like, but they are. I mean the Speedee Mart gas station near my place is posting for jobs starting at $12 an hour. I never thought I’d see wages like that at a convenience store. That’s close to what I started at with my current job when I joined a few years ago and I’ve had raises since then.

As I said in one of my first posts:
“(C)onservatives and libertarians mostly think that we shouldn’t make the welfare system too “cushy” because that will de-incentivize work since at some level you could get a better standard of living without working. But that policy has two issues: One, given the “Puritan work ethic” of this country, it’s very unlikely that we ever will have a comprehensive welfare state on the level of an EU country, at least not with our current political class. And two, given that fact, the gradual desertion of the workforce is not so much because the benefits of welfare are so great, but because the benefits of work are so meager. Put another way, if you’re going to be just scraping by whether you have a job or not, you might as well be just scraping by with plenty of free time on the government dole as opposed to just scraping by while busting your ass over 40 hours a week. “

This country didn’t suddenly get socialist. On the whole, you’ve still got the same Ayn Rand-meets-Puritanism approach to welfare in America, and the government’s current level of unemployment benefits is actually more stingy than what businesses had been paying, just as our “socialist” minimum wage was already less than what the market would bear even before Trump Virus, when most fast-food joints had to pay at least a dollar over the Federal minimum to hire people. But now that the country has created a situation where many people weren’t allowed to work, the dynamic has tipped.

And just think, this change happened all because of Donald Trump, our most freeist market, capitalest president EVAR!

I mean maybe this isn’t capitalism in the libertarian, laissez-faire sense, but in the sense of “the economy works because actions have consequences”, maybe it is.

All this gets into how the Left can be philosophically wrong yet be on the right side of the political debate. Like how they say “healthcare is a human right,” which is bullshit. Not that we don’t NEED healthcare, I mean that it’s the wrong argument. You have people running certain parts of government who don’t think we HAVE rights, such as the right not to get killed by a cop for a non-capital crime, or the right to vote if it’s not for a Republican, so don’t try to persuade those people with rights you made up. Nobody, even on the Left, thinks that an interstate highway system is a “human right”, but we paid for it – at least we used to – because everyone saw it as a common benefit. That’s how you need to phrase this.

You don’t pay people 300 bucks a week (which is conditional in any case) because you want to encourage mooching. You do it because it would take the economy that much longer to recover if we had that many more able-bodied and gainfully employed people made homeless in less than a year because The Greatest President The Business Community Ever Had decided that coronavirus wasn’t real and therefore we didn’t need to account for face-to-face services having to shut down across the country.

But hey, at least you got that Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, huh? How’s that working out now?

If even $300 a week is more than 25 percent of unemployment recipients got from working, by the CoC’s own estimate, then that shows how much they got from working. As a right-winger, I can conditionally tolerate unemployment supports until we get this country and economy back to normal. The fact that the business community thinks that $300 a week is spoiling people means that the status quo pre-COVID really wasn’t normal.

And as with a lot of other things, the solution is not to go back to normal, but to find something better than normal, because ‘normal’ was how everything got fucked in the first place.